Stream: general

Topic: depozīta punkti

Rihards Olups (Feb 21 2023 at 15:52):

Šobrīd depozīta vietu kartēšana ir ļoti nekonsekventa - piem., viens:
amenity=vending_machine
vending=bottle_return
operator=Rimi

Rihards Olups (Feb 21 2023 at 15:53):

Cits:
amenity=recycling
brand=Depozīta punkts
name=Depozīta punkts
recycling:cans=yes
recycling:glass_bottles=yes
recycling:plastic_bottles=yes
recycling_type=centre

Rihards Olups (Feb 21 2023 at 15:57):

Pirmkārt jau recycling_type=centre šķiet nepareizi, jo "These centres are dedicated areas for collecting a wider range of recyclable household materials."

Otrkārt, name laikam būtu ņemams nost.

Treškārt, nav skaidrs ar brand. Jā, var teikt, ka visi viņi ir "Depozīta punkts", bet reāli jau ikdienā apkopj (iztukšo) veikali.
Pie tam, vajag norādīt, kuros veikalos vispār derēs kuponi.

i-ky (Feb 21 2023 at 16:02):

NSI ir divi preset'i:

1. https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=amenity&v=recycling#depozitapunkts-831330
2. https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=amenity&v=vending_machine#depozitapunkts-cc4c61

Pie tam pievienoti ar vienu commit'u.

Pēc Overpass skatoties 1. ir populārāks.

Rihards Olups (Feb 21 2023 at 17:01):

Hmm, tas centre šķiet pamatīgi nepareizs, ja vien kaut kur tiešām nav lieli "Depozīta punkts" centri.
Un abiem "name" šķiet diezgan garām.

HellMap (Feb 21 2023 at 23:23):

A kas īsti ir tajās sakranajās depozīta punkta būdās? Es tur neesmu bijis nekad. Kartē arī neesmu īsti atzīmējis.

Rihards Olups (Feb 22 2023 at 11:47):

Depozīta aparāti, viens vai divi. Apspriežot ar starptautisko kopienu, tika ieteikts zīmēt būdiņas atsevišķi un tad attiecīgi vienu vai divas aparātu nodes.

i-ky (Feb 22 2023 at 12:04):

recycling_type=centre var būt garām, bet vismaz to var redzēt uz default OSM flīzēm. Šeit piemēram, vending=bottle_return ir pilnīgi neredzams, bet divi recycling_type=container blakus katrs dabū savu ikoniņu. Lasot https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4580 rodas tāds WTF moments...

i-ky (Feb 22 2023 at 12:27):

Rihards Olups said:

Apspriežot ar starptautisko kopienu, tika ieteikts zīmēt būdiņas atsevišķi un tad attiecīgi vienu vai divas aparātu nodes.

Ja veikalam ir divi kases aparāti, tad to arī zīmēt kā divus ?!

Rihards Olups (Feb 22 2023 at 13:22):

Jā, tās Github issue loģikai īsti nepiekrītu, lai gan daļa ir saprotama. Tā novecojušā SVG jēgu neizpratu :)
Pievienoju komentāru, neko citu jau tur neizdarīs.
Varam demonstratīvi vienoties, ka Latvijā šos tagosim kā recycling centre :D

Kases aparāti - vai tad tos kāds cenšas iezīmēt OSM?

i-ky (Feb 22 2023 at 13:33):

Rihards Olups said:

Kases aparāti - vai tad tos kāds cenšas iezīmēt OSM?

Nē, jo man būtu vienalga, cik kases aparāti ir veikalā. Tāpat man nav svarīgi, cik aparātu ir Depozīta punktā.
Ņemot vērā, ka uz ortofoto būdiņu vēl nav, es būtu priecīgs arī ja ir vienkārši

Rihards Olups (Feb 22 2023 at 18:57):

Es sākumā tos tagus pievienoju būdiņai, bet pēc tās sarunas sāku likt kā punktus.
Protams, ka viens punkts labāk nekā nekas - kā jau OSM ierasts, tuvinājumi ir standarta prakse :)

i-ky (Feb 23 2023 at 19:46):

Vēl viena lieta par tiem amenity=recycling + recycling_type=* vs. amenity=vending + vending=bottle_return - vajag atcerēties, ka Nominatim special phrases ir tikai vienu tagu "dziļi", un ja nevarēs meklēt depozīta punktus pēc name vai brand (teiksim, ja viņiem parādīsies "konkurents"), tad būs pavisam skumji.
Pat šobrīd ar Nominatim nav ideāli. Viņš rāda rezultāta "kategoriju" (laikam arī balstās uz special phrases) un dažiem Depozīta punktiem tā ir "Recycling", bet dažiem - "Vending machine".

Depozīta punkts

Rihards Olups (Feb 26 2023 at 18:34):

Vai pareizi sapratu, ka amenity=recycling gadījumā tādā situācijā nevarētu atrast, jo nebūtu viena identificējoša taga kā vending=bottle_return?

i-ky (Feb 27 2023 at 09:08):

Nē, vending=* vispār nepiedalās atlasē, jo tas ir second class citizen. Var meklēt vai nu "Recycling station" (un tad Depozīta punkti būs kopā ar konteineriem un citiem amenity=recycling), vai nu "Vending machine" (un tad Depozīta punkti būs kopā ar citiem amenity=vending).

i-ky (Feb 27 2023 at 09:13):

Tāpēc man vairāk patīk variants zīmēt tos kā amenity=recycling + recycling_type=machine vai līdzīgi, kā bija pieminēts šeit. recycling_type=machine|vending_machine|reverse_vending_machine šobrīd ir aptuveni 10 reiz mazāk nekā vending=bottle_return, bet arī vending=bottle_return vēl nav pārāk daudz.

Rihards Olups (Feb 28 2023 at 23:07):

Kā tādā gadījumā strādātu meklēšana?
Un vai Nominatim būtu reāli to uzlabot, lai vieglāk varētu meklēt vending=bottle_return?

i-ky (Mar 01 2023 at 10:14):

Rihards Olups said:

Kā tādā gadījumā strādātu meklēšana?

Ja es pareizi saprotu, ar "Recycling station" special phrase varētu atrast gan Depozīta punktus, gan konteinerus, gan pārstrādes centrus. Arī meklējot pēc nosaukuma Depozīta punktiem būtu "Recycling" kategorija rezultātu sarakstā.

i-ky (Mar 01 2023 at 10:17):

Rihards Olups said:

Un vai Nominatim būtu reāli to uzlabot, lai vieglāk varētu meklēt vending=bottle_return?

Es nepazīstu Nominatim kodu, tāpēc nevaru atbildēt. Par to jājautā maintainer'iem. Var atdzīvināt šo diskusiju, tur arī runa ir par "secondary tags" (amenity=bank + atm=yes = ATM, amenity=pub + food=yes = fast food, etc.)

Rihards Olups (Jun 03 2023 at 13:10):

Par depozītiem - daļai ir / ir pielikti name="Depozīta punkts".
Šķiet, tie visi būtu ņemami nost, vai ir kādi iebildumi?

i-ky (Jun 03 2023 at 18:09):

Kāpēc? Pēc NSI datiem tiem jābūt ar tādiem name.

HellMap (Jun 03 2023 at 18:14):

Uz tām būdām tač ir liels uzraksts "Depozīta punkts" - tas būtu vistaisnākais on-the-ground name

Rihards Olups (Jun 05 2023 at 08:54):

i-ky said:

Kāpēc? Pēc NSI datiem tiem jābūt ar tādiem name.

NSI var būt un dažreiz ir kļūdaini - tad tik pull requesti :)

Rihards Olups (Jun 05 2023 at 08:57):

HellMap said:

Uz tām būdām tač ir liels uzraksts "Depozīta punkts" - tas būtu vistaisnākais on-the-ground name

Uz dažiem lauku veikaliem ir "veikals", bet tas noteikti nav to vietu _vārds_/nosaukums.
Uz Swedbank bankomātiem ir "Swedbank", bet tas nav bankomātiem name. Arī pieminētajā NSI tas atspoguļots: https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=amenity&v=atm#swedbank-ab2e60 .

i-ky (Jun 05 2023 at 08:59):

Rihards Olups said:

i-ky said:

Kāpēc? Pēc NSI datiem tiem jābūt ar tādiem name.

NSI var būt un dažreiz ir kļūdaini - tad tik pull requesti :)

Tur ļoti daudz ierakstu, kam sakrīt name un brand...
Vari uztaisīt PR par Depozīta punktiem, redzēsim, ko maintainer'i teiks.

Rihards Olups (Jun 05 2023 at 09:01):

Depozīta punktiem ir [vismaz] divi operator - ikdienas darbību nodrošinošais, kas attiecīgi ir veikals, kurš nomaina pilnos konteinerus, tīra utml uztur šīs vietas.
Depozīta punkts tos remontē utt.

Es teiktu, ka Depozīta punkts pat nav operator OSM kontekstā nemaz, jo tā sasaiste ar veikalu ir daudz praktiskāka un datu izmantotājam nozīmīgāka.
No viena lietotājiem ir pilnīgi 0 ieguvumu, no otra - praktiski skaidrs, ar kuru veikalu šim punktam ir sasaiste.

Rihards Olups (Jun 05 2023 at 09:03):

i-ky said:

Rihards Olups said:

Pēc NSI datiem tiem jābūt ar tādiem name.

NSI var būt un dažreiz ir kļūdaini - tad tik pull requesti :)
````

Tur *ļoti* daudz ierakstu, kam sakrīt `name` un `brand`...
Vari uztaisīt PR par Depozīta punktiem, redzēsim, ko maintainer'i teiks.
`````

Ir tradicionāli lietotie, dažām veikalu ķēdēm utt.
Maintaineri lielākoties necenšas neko uzspiest - uztaisa sanity check, un pievieno :)
Mums kopienā būtu jāvienojas, lai nav rediģēšanas konflikti.

Rihards Olups (Jun 05 2023 at 09:04):

Es šos pielīdzinātu ATM, pakomātiem utt.
Nav nosaukumi "Omniva", "DPD", "SEB"...

i-ky (Jun 05 2023 at 09:31):

Rihards Olups said:

Es šos pielīdzinātu ATM, pakomātiem utt.
Nav nosaukumi "Omniva", "DPD", "SEB"...

Nominatim ir problēmas ar ATM bez name, lūk:

atm near domina shopping

Viņam šķiet, ka bankomāta adrese ir svarīgāka par operator. Es nepiekritu.

i-ky (Jun 05 2023 at 09:33):

Tāpēc pirms mēs ņemam nost name no Depozīta punktiem, es gribētu pārliecināties, ka tas nerādīs problēmas ar default renderer'i, Nominatim, populāro aplikāciju stiliem utt.

Rihards Olups (Jun 05 2023 at 09:45):

Nominatim rezultāti jokaini, jā.
Vai ir zināms kāds reports Nominatim autoriem? Pameklēju, nevarēju atrast.

i-ky (Jun 05 2023 at 09:55):

Rihards Olups said:

Nominatim rezultāti jokaini, jā.
Vai ir zināms kāds reports Nominatim autoriem? Pameklēju, nevarēju atrast.

Šeit pieminēts, ka tagad brand tiek vairāk izmantots operator vietā. Šeit pateikts, ka jātaisa jaunus issues, ja gribat indeksēt operator noteikta tipa objektiem.

Rihards Olups (Jun 05 2023 at 10:40):

Ahh. Hmm.
Tad varbūt bankomātiem brand, un depozīta punktiem operator=veikals, brand="Depozīta punkts"?

i-ky (Jun 05 2023 at 10:49):

Rihards Olups said:

Ahh. Hmm.
Tad varbūt bankomātiem brand, un depozīta punktiem operator=veikals, brand="Depozīta punkts"?

Vismaz Nominatim šādus (piemēram šo) var atrast pēc vaicājuma:

Depozīta punkts

Vienīgi bez name ar default stilu to nevar atšķirt no parasta recycling konteinera, kas ir slikti.

HellMap (Jun 05 2023 at 11:08):

Reāli es meklētu piemēram "Depozīta punkts Rimi"... No results found

HellMap (Jun 05 2023 at 11:32):

Vispār, tas, ka meklējot punktus nerāda uzreiz kartē visus ir ļoti bēdīgi. Man tā visa OSMF nostāja, ka galvenā karte tas ir tikai tā - paraugs - nepatīk. Lietotāju adopcija nav un nebūs ar tādu pieeju.

i-ky (Jun 05 2023 at 11:42):

HellMap said:

Reāli es meklētu piemēram "Depozīta punkts Rimi"... No results found

Būtu labs issue priekš Nominatim, man neizdevās atrast neko līdzīgu.

i-ky (Jun 05 2023 at 11:57):

Skatoties, cik ilgi aizņem uzpildes stacijām pielikt brand paliek ļoti skumji.

Rihards Olups (Jun 15 2023 at 21:18):

Par tagiem - tagad jauni tagi parādījušies piedāvājumā:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:vending%3Dbottle_return&diff=0&oldid=2494709

recycling:refund_bottles
recycling:refund_bottle_crates

i-ky (Jun 16 2023 at 07:10):

Rihards Olups said:

Par tagiem - tagad jauni tagi parādījušies piedāvājumā:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:vending%3Dbottle_return&diff=0&oldid=2494709

recycling:refund_bottles
recycling:refund_bottle_crates

• recycling:glass_bottles=* Indicates whether the machine accepts glass bottles
• recycling:plastic_bottles=* Indicates whether the machine accepts plastic bottles
• recycling:refund_bottles=* Indicates whether the machine accepts bottles... made of refund? No, actually both bottles and cans.

Consistency Award 2023 :applause:

i-ky (Jun 16 2023 at 07:19):

Kāpēc nevar recycling:accepts=cans;glass_bottles;plastic_bottles;bottle_crates?

Rihards Olups (May 23 2024 at 08:49):

markalex2209 said:

---

I have a question regarding Depozīta punkts.
Right now they are added as two types: amenity=recycling or amenity=vending_machine
https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/commit/df7f4035e802a3145ce07d062a1d92b14b700393
I can only assume that they were added just because they started appearing in this two types, and author didn't actually know that these are the same(?) things.

Should we fix this, and leave only one (and which one)?
Or should we leave it as is (and maybe ascribe some mnemonic meaning, like vending machine is when it's inside a shop, and recycling centre is a standalone building)?

No distinction, at least no convention, based on their layout - for some context, see #general > depozīta punkti.
Unifying them would be great, but it cannot be a pure mechanical edit, manual verification still needed.

Rihards Olups (May 23 2024 at 08:51):

To keep it all a bit more organised, took the liberty to move some posts here - hopefully that's OK.

Rihards Olups (May 23 2024 at 08:54):

markalex2209 said:

Also, is there any kind of established practice for tagging manual deposit points?

Not that I know of, but others could chime in.
These would be great to map, although that would most likely happen from the official upstream source, as surveying them would be nearly impossible.

markalex2209 (May 23 2024 at 08:57):

Rihards Olups said:

markalex2209 said:

Also, is there any kind of established practice for tagging manual deposit points?

Not that I know of, but others could chime in.
These would be great to map, although that would most likely happen from the official upstream source, as surveying them would be nearly impossible.

Yeah, this question is related to osmalyzer)
We found that upstream contains both automatically and manual ones. And I don't know if we have any agreement how to tag manual ones so that we could actually compare upstream with osm.

markalex2209 (May 23 2024 at 09:00):

Also, there is some strange third type (mentioned it in issue, forgot how it's called exactly now, something like bohentaromats)
No clue for now what it is, and what to do with it.

markalex2209 (May 23 2024 at 09:13):

• Beramtaromāts

HellMap (May 23 2024 at 09:22):

markalex2209 said:

• Beramtaromāts

I relied on the issue about that one before I read this. It's a vending machine. Same as "A" but not in a dedicated building.

HellMap (May 23 2024 at 09:27):

I'm really not sure about manual return at shop. I don't see any tags to add to a shop or amenity.

Rihards Olups (May 23 2024 at 09:38):

markalex2209 said:

Also, there is some strange third type (mentioned it in issue, forgot how it's called exactly now, something like bohentaromats)
No clue for now what it is, and what to do with it.

From the name, it seems like on of those where bottles/cans are poured in a large opening, as opposed to being fed one by one - and then the machine just sorts them out automatically.
But I didn't know we have them in Latvia?

Bērt = to pour [for non-liquids]
Berams, berama (masculine, femnine) - one to be poured. Thus "beram" loses the gender-specific ending, leaving it to the second part of the compound word.

HellMap (May 23 2024 at 09:41):

Also, notably, you cannot return glass there.

HellMap (May 23 2024 at 09:41):

But it's basically just a bigger hole than regular ones - you can put multiples in. I am not sure there is a tag to distinguish this...

Dāvis Kļaviņš (May 23 2024 at 09:56):

Rihards Olups said:

But I didn't know we have them in Latvia?

https://www.depozitapunkts.lv/darbibu-uzsak-latvija-pirmais-beramtaromats

HellMap (May 23 2024 at 11:04):

Rihards Olups said:

Bērt = to pour [for non-liquids]
Berams, berama (masculine, femnine) - one to be poured. Thus "beram" loses the gender-specific ending, leaving it to the second part of the compound word.

I can't wait for you to explain "taromāts" :wink:

Rihards Olups (May 23 2024 at 11:29):

Reserving that for the next in-person event ;)

Rihards Olups (May 24 2024 at 11:02):

Heya @markalex2209, noticed you changing these to vending machines.
While that was something I preferred, we didn't quite reach conclusion (and there might be editors with a recycling centre preset).

Perhaps it's worth reopening that discussion :)

markalex2209 (May 24 2024 at 14:30):

Rihards Olups said:

Heya markalex2209, noticed you changing these to vending machines.
While that was something I preferred, we didn't quite reach conclusion (and there might be editors with a recycling centre preset).

Perhaps it's worth reopening that discussion :)

Yeah based on this wiki page and your comment, I've gone ahead and replaced them to vending machines (popping out them into POIs from buildings were there were ones)

markalex2209 (May 24 2024 at 14:31):

I assumed that this wiki indicates consensus. And ambiguous tagging is undesired

markalex2209 (May 24 2024 at 14:44):

andrisl also shown disagreement with my action. I asked them to join this chat.

markalex2209 (May 24 2024 at 14:56):

Let me do, what I probably should have done before, and share my vision, and let community to judge how accurate it is.

I think that all automated taromats should be tagged as amenity=vending_machine + vending=bottle_return (usual ones with recycling:cans, recycling:plastic_bottles and recycling:glass_bottles and beromtaromats without last one).
Additionally, each usual ones and beromtaromats to have a single instance in NSI (two in total) in amenity=vending_machine category.

Also, shops that provide manual reclamation of bottles, to be tagged with recycling:cans, recycling:plastic_bottles and recycling:glass_bottles.

markalex2209 (May 24 2024 at 14:58):

Also, @Rihards Olups thank you very much for your explanation of word formation. This feels like out of my league for now, but I very much appreciate this)

Andris Liepiņš (May 24 2024 at 17:02):

@markalex2209 Tagging itself is okay and I would have no objections but, as I said in my comment under your changeset, amenity=vending_machine is not rendered on the default map. So as a result of your changeset, all of the Depozīta punkts elements got hidden. Considering that amenity=recycling at least gives a hint about the purpose of Depozīta Punkts (people leave their bottles there, they are taken away and recycled), this tag IMO is the most accurate one. I know some might call this "tagging for the renderer" but this is not really true in this case.

If recycling_type=centre is not a desirable tag, then perhaps Depozīta Punkts POI's could be tagged with only amenity=recycling tag without recycling_type=*.

HellMap (May 24 2024 at 18:19):

I will say that it is unfortunate that the default renderer does not show amenity=vending_machine on the map...

HellMap (May 24 2024 at 18:24):

I think that buildings that house the recycling vending machine should be themselves tagged as amenity=recycling location and not a vending machine. And if we want to micromap, then a POI for the vending machine can be placed in it(there may be 2 or more or even manual). But the amenity itself is a designated recycling location that happens to have a vending machine.

HellMap (May 24 2024 at 18:25):

Whether it is rendered or not (on the default map, other maps might differ - for example, OsmAnd does show bottle return vending machines) should not be a deciding factor, but it does add some strength to the choice as basically what A.L. said above.

HellMap (May 24 2024 at 18:27):

The solitary vending machine POIs that are in shops or other places I would agree with M should be simply vending machines and as I said - it is unfortunate they don't render. But I cannot really justify "mistagging" them as recycling locations just for the rendering. I feel this is something we need to request Carto to start rendering.

markalex2209 (May 24 2024 at 19:04):

Just to be clear, when I encountered buildings tagged as amenity=recycling (it was 13 of them in linked changeset and a couple more later) I retagged them into amenity=vending_machine and in a later changeset extracted node from them.

markalex2209 (May 24 2024 at 19:36):

I still feel a bit doubtful about amenity=recycling, because in my mind those should be something significantly bigger than our buildings.
And this part of wiki

These centres are dedicated areas for collecting a wider range of recyclable household materials.

(emphasis mine), I'd say agrees with me.

But on the other hand, I agree that there is a clear distinction between those two, and there might be some benefit in tagging them in a distinct way.

HellMap (May 24 2024 at 19:39):

I should note I do not believe these should be tagged recycling_type=centre

HellMap (May 24 2024 at 19:41):

I feel like the current mini-building that Latvia has is something quite new in the world of vending-recycling, so OSM doesn't have an exact tag for this. We could literally create one for this purpose/function - that's basically how OSM works, although it's very rare to make up new stuff nowadays that isn't just a few examples.

Andris Liepiņš (May 24 2024 at 19:43):

Additional note: some deposit point buildings haven't been mapped yet like here, here, here, here, here. Results of your edit now imply that there are single vending machines in the middle of a street without buildings. Now we have to draw every deposit point building to specify that there is building with a vending machine not vending machine alone in the middle of street or parking. amenity=recycling made up for the building implying that there is a place where stuff is recycled.

Edit: fixed two of them

markalex2209 (May 24 2024 at 19:46):

Good point, Andris. Haven't thought about this implication.

HellMap (May 24 2024 at 20:06):

As an example, this newish DP with beramtaromāts https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=460168579826229&focus=photo actually has 4 vending machines in it - one is beramtaromāts (no glass) and the other 3 are regular - this is something we could theoretically micromap
max-dp-beram.png

HellMap (May 24 2024 at 20:08):

So I think it's reasonable to tag the building as recycling amenity with appropriate types of items and then if desired also add vending machines which can elaborate how exactly it can be done. But not just the vending machines, of which there can be 2+.

markalex2209 (May 24 2024 at 20:18):

I'm not sure I fully get this sentence:

But not just the vending machines, of which there can be 2+.

HellMap (May 24 2024 at 20:20):

I mean - not have a vending machine node POI by itself without a building + recycling amenity. In addition, there can be 2+ vending machines in that building, so having a single POI (by itself) also isn't technically accurate.

markalex2209 (May 24 2024 at 21:38):

Ok. I suggest a plan, please indicate if this is adequate.

1. I go through currently mapped punkts, and if they have buildings around then (solely dedicated ones) or if it's obvious that they do, I tag that building with

amenity=recycling
brand=Depozīta punkts
brand:wikidata=Q110979381
name=Depozīta punkts
recycling:cans=yes
recycling:glass_bottles=yes
recycling:plastic_bottles=yes

!without recycling_type=centre,

2. Somebody familiar with Latvian OSM wiki (and capable of doing that, so sadly not me) edits in description of how to tag depozita punkts, all three reclamation modes: manual, usual taromats and beramtaromats. And also, dedicated building if there is one.
3. I (or whoever wants to) request change in NSI to exclude recycling_type=centre from amenity=recycling one, add beramtaromats into amenity=vending_machine and add notes explaining how to use all three of them.

One unresolved issue: what to do with places where building is not immediately obvious? Tag with fixme? Leave note?

HellMap (May 24 2024 at 21:48):

A quick note, not sure if you intended or not, but the building should still have building=* with some appropriate value (I haven't looked into it, but if we're standartizing, might as well pick a value)

markalex2209 (May 24 2024 at 21:52):

No, when I wrote this I had in mind simple building=yes. And if it already had addr tags to leave them in place.
But you are right, since we are at it, might just as well discuss this detail.

markalex2209 (May 25 2024 at 11:33):

I haven't found perfect match, but my favourite is building=kiosk. It doesn't exactly match description in wiki, but we already have quite a few "walk-in" Narvessens with same exact situation.

HellMap (May 25 2024 at 13:07):

That sounds good, that's a pretty good description actually

markalex2209 (May 26 2024 at 09:02):

I've tagged buildings for outside of Riga and Valmiera. Those two have a lot, I'll do it later.

markalex2209 (May 26 2024 at 09:06):

Also, I stumbled upon this issue: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4580, and I find it very sad.

Rihards Olups (May 26 2024 at 20:45):

Hehe, people rediscover that issue every few months :)

markalex2209 (May 27 2024 at 12:20):

I've tagged buildings as amenity=recycling back (actually way more than I removed initially)

Last updated: Dec 22 2024 at 03:46 UTC