RSS (Nov 08 2023 at 12:11): RSS (Nov 08 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143753725 (Comment no. 2) by Edgars Počs
Contributor: Edgars Počs
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Paldies!
Date: 2023-11-08T12:06:39+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143753725
RSS (Nov 08 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143231730 (Comment no. 6) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 6
Comment: Jā, bet te gan tādu nav - te visur parastās ietves.
Date: 2023-11-08T09:10:46+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143231730
RSS (Nov 08 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 120508883 (Comment no. 1) by dieterdreist
Contributor: dieterdreist
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi Dāvis, have a look now, the plural is clearly preferred: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=shop%3Dweighing#tags
Date: 2023-11-08T08:34:56+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120508883
RSS (Nov 08 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143611850 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Given that Rigas Satiksme still lists this stop for many routes, I have reverted this changeset pending clarification.
Date: 2023-11-06T15:50:23+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143611850
RSS (Nov 08 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143634387 (Comment no. 1) by i-ky
Contributor: i-ky
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiks!Velojosla jau bija iezīmēta ar cycleway:right=lane uz brauktuves līnijas (sk. changeset #131144975). Motivāciju tieši tādai iezīmēšanai var palasīt Zulip'ā (https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/360539-veloinfrastrukt.C5.ABra/topic/velojoslas.20k.C4.81.20atsevi.C5.A1.C4.B7i.20ce.C4.BCi/near/319462590) vai arhīvā (https://osmlatvija.github.io/zulip-archive/stream/360539-veloinfrastrukt.C5.ABra/topic/velojoslas.20k.C4.81.20atsevi.C5.A1.C4.B7i.20ce.C4.BCi.html#319462590).
Date: 2023-11-06T11:33:46+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143634387
RSS (Nov 08 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143604801 (Comment no. 2) by Pytsa
Contributor: Pytsa
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: There's supposed to be only one point for Jauniela street - this is the street that was used as Baker Street for the Sherlock Holmes films in the Soviet Union
Date: 2023-11-04T16:01:25+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143604801
RSS (Nov 08 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143564474 (Comment no. 3) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: A kas tur tagad ir? Barjeras, zāle, vienkārši zīme?
Date: 2023-11-03T15:50:36+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143564474
RSS (Nov 08 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143487301 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!Lūgums nelikt šādi access tegus daudzām kategorijām dažādi. 302. ceļu zīme (aplis) aizliedz iebraukt transportlīdzekļiem, izņemot ar mērķi (dzīvo, piegāde, utt.) OSM to atzīmē kā vehicle=destination vai motor_vehicle=destination (jo faktiski nav domāts velosipēdiem). Visiem pārējiem pārvietošanās veidiem ir noklusētā vērtība. Piemēram, šeit nav aizliegts braukt mopēdiem vai motocikliem. Un motorcar=no tad arī aizliegtu braukt mašīnām.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Transportlīdzekļu_ierobežojumiPaldies
Date: 2023-11-02T15:54:58+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143487301
RSS (Nov 08 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143475604 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Ar šo izmaiņu tika iezīmēti divi identiski ceļi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1219732822 un https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1220017276 . Jau daudz reižu ir lūgts rediģēt uzmanīgāk.
Date: 2023-11-01T14:51:13+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143475604
RSS (Nov 08 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 143604801 (Comment no. 6) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 6
Comment: ...although technically the alleyway was called (loc\_name) like that back then, there was no memorial - not sure whether a memorial exists there now, the place is private and fenced off.
Date: 2023-11-08T15:04:40+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143604801
RSS (Nov 08 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 143527825 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Šī laikam nav oficiāla adrese, jo nav VZD datos?
Date: 2023-11-08T14:07:14+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143527825
RSS (Nov 09 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143797286 (Comment no. 2) by Martins_P
Contributor: Martins\_P
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Tā ir kaut kāda radošā darbnīca/veikals.
Date: 2023-11-09T08:21:29+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143797286
RSS (Nov 10 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143797286 (Comment no. 4) by Martins_P
Contributor: Martins_P
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: manuprāt, hibrīdi un inovācijas dara savu, lai taptu jauni apzīmējumi.
Date: 2023-11-10T09:49:26+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143797286
RSS (Nov 10 2023 at 18:07):Changeset 143797286 (Comment no. 5) by i-ky
Contributor: i-ky
Discussion Comment No.: 5
Comment: Par shop=crafting nav Wiki apraksta. Apraksts ir shop=craft, kas nešķiet atbilstošs.Mājaslapā (https://sparkle.is/par-radoso-studiju/) teikts:\* organizējam radošās darbnīcas\* izīrējam telpas jūsu radošajām nodarbībām/darbnīcām/biznesa tikšanām\* pie mums var rīkot svētku pasākumus ar vai bez mūsu radošajām darbnīcām\* izīrējam telpas pa stundām uz fotosesijām/video filmēšanuNo OSM Wiki aprakstītajiem, manuprāt, derētu amenity=training;arts_centre;events_venue
Date: 2023-11-10T12:42:58+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143797286
RSS (Nov 12 2023 at 00:33):Changeset 143915564 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!Zīmējot ietves, tās ir pēc iespējas jāsavieno vietās, kur faktiski gājēji var šķērsot ielas. Šajā gadījumā, pie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11342052559 ir pilnīgi pareizi savienot https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1222826217 ar https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/991533506 vai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1163578324 ar vēl neuzzīmētu turpinājumu. Ja ietves šādi nebūs savienotas, tad maršrutēšana te arī nestrādās. Parasti tādās blīvās vietās ietves veidos "četrstūri", piemēram līdzīgi kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26609138 krustojums.
Date: 2023-11-11T23:27:22+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143915564
RSS (Nov 12 2023 at 12:10):Changeset 143928709 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello!It seems very unlikely that this is the name of the memorial/gravestone, let alone written in Ukrainian. Passing by this (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=922495375646553&focus=photo), I do not see any obvious inscription of such length. Can you please specify where exactly is this text found that you have added?Thankshttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability
Date: 2023-11-12T11:38:35+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143928709
RSS (Nov 12 2023 at 12:10):Changeset 143915564 (Comment no. 2) by Martins_P
Contributor: Martins_P
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Baigi labi, salikšu atpakaļ!
Date: 2023-11-12T07:15:02+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143915564
RSS (Nov 13 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143943448 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,Izdzēšot Gaujas ielas posmu tika salauzti autobusu maršruti. Es šeit izlaboju, bet lūdzu nākotnē uzmanīgāk, ja tiek dzēsti būtiski ielu gabali.
Date: 2023-11-13T10:41:46+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143943448
RSS (Nov 13 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143928709 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: You have now added an English name, which is different to the previous "name". Can you please clarify where these names are from? Are these descriptions and, if so, what is the source for them?
Date: 2023-11-13T10:21:38+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143928709
RSS (Nov 13 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 143634387 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Sveiki, šo izmaiņu pagaidām atcēlu, jo neesam saņēmuši atbildi un šādā veidā šeit dati ir nepareizi/dublēti.
Date: 2023-11-13T10:16:42+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143634387
RSS (Nov 13 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 143943448 (Comment no. 4) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Ir slēgta, bet runa par 9. autobusa turp-atpakaļ maršrutu/relācijām, kuras bija palikušas pa Gaujas ielu un ar pārrāvumu Brasas pārbrauktuvei. Tās vajadzēja pārlikt uz Brasas tiltu. Vai pagaidām vismaz nedzēst pārbrauktuvi (uzlikt access=no, piemēram), lai maršruts nesalūzt pilnībā.
Date: 2023-11-13T16:08:17+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143943448
RSS (Nov 14 2023 at 00:30):Changeset 143943448 (Comment no. 5) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 5
Comment: Vēl jāatceras, ka no Google/Waze nedrīkst neko pārzīmēt.
Date: 2023-11-13T18:29:34+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143943448
RSS (Nov 14 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 144002280 (Comment no. 3) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: The bike route that you moved was only the name on the foot/cycleways "Centrs - Mežaparks". This isn't a route relation. The relations I'm talking about are:E9 - City Centre - Vecāķi https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10016280Piejūras ceļš https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11803322Svētā Jēkaba ceļš https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12304214EuroVelo 13 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2769637#map=8/56.987/22.741&layers=NI rerouted them over the bridge. This is more complicated to do, which is why I mentioned this for the future reference.P. S. This is not part of the issue, but I also created and properly set up the Centrs - Mežaparks route/relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16695367 . That's how local cycling routes are normally supposed to be done.
Date: 2023-11-14T11:23:59+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144002280
RSS (Nov 15 2023 at 00:31):Changeset 143943448 (Comment no. 6) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 6
Comment: Kāds cits kartētājs norādījis, ka pārbrauktuve joprojām ir vaļā līdz mēneša beigām. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144015095Tā kā, ja tiešām ir izmantots Waze/Google nevis personīgi pārbaudīts (vai no piemēram ziņām) - tad to nevajadzēja vispār mainīt/dzēst pagaidām.
Date: 2023-11-14T17:12:01+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143943448
RSS (Nov 16 2023 at 00:31):Changeset 144069206 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Thanks for the map correction.
I wanted to clarify whether this connection is completely impassable or if it's just not a road connection, but bike or people can still walk through on a dirt track or path? This connection is part of cadaster road line, so it's unlikely that it is blocked off completely.
Thanks
Date: 2023-11-15T22:37:15+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144069206
RSS (Nov 20 2023 at 00:32):Changeset 144208580 (Comment no. 2) by Evropeec
Contributor: Evropeec
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: "Wanted to ask you - is this cafe (pizza place?) inside the building?" - Yes. Is the "Eldorado casino/gambling hall no longer in the building?" - Yes it is
Date: 2023-11-19T20:13:18+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144208580
RSS (Nov 20 2023 at 00:32):Changeset 144215778 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Paldies par izmaiņām.
Gribēju pieminēt, ka OSM lielākā daļa lauku vērtību ir iepriekš definētas, angļu valodā un lielākoties standartizētas pasaulē. Piemēram "u_veida" un "trijstūra_veida" vērtības datos nederēs, jo šīs nekas nemācēs apstrādāt. Šeit jāliek vērtība "stands", kas ir statīvi, kur pieslien riteni. Tā kā pasaulē ir simtiem variantu šiem, tad sīkāk šīs vērtības nedalās.
Par vērtībām var izlasīt šeit: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking
Es pievienotos statīvus jau pārlaboju.
Paldies
Date: 2023-11-19T19:38:29+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144215778
RSS (Nov 21 2023 at 00:32):Changeset 144258067 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Thanks for your addition.
But the school has already been drawn here as an area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14209436
A new point would duplicate the school element, so I have removed it for now and fixed the name. The existing area also had most of the information (except opening hours, which we usually don't include for schools because they vary a lot as you can see at https://www.ozolniekuvsk.lv/kontakti/ ).
Let me know if you have any questions.
Date: 2023-11-20T22:40:52+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144258067
RSS (Nov 22 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 144315602 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Kadastrā šis ceļa gabals joprojām ir "Stārķa ceļš" gar ēku. Vai Kuldīgas pašvaldību dokumentos ir citi dati par to?
Date: 2023-11-22T17:48:58+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144315602
RSS (Nov 24 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 144371611 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes uzlabošanu.
Šajā gadījumā objekts jau ir amenity=toilets, tam var droši ņemt nost toilets=yes - šo otru tagu dažreiz pievieno pamatobjektam (piemēram, degvielas uzpildes stacijai), lai norādītu, ka tajā ir pieejama tualete.
Kopā ar amenity=toilets tas sanāk kā "šajā tualetē iekšā ir tualete".
Date: 2023-11-24T08:56:44+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144371611
RSS (Nov 24 2023 at 18:07):Changeset 144406056 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Pedantic high-five! =)
Date: 2023-11-24T13:11:08+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144406056
RSS (Nov 27 2023 at 00:32):Changeset 144371611 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Paldies par skaidrojumu.
Tad gan būtu jāņem nost, jo OSM ir "don't tag for the renderer" princips - neveidot datus, "hakojot" kādu rīku.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Oriģināli tas bija par tagiem, kurus nepareizi izmantoja, lai kaut kas parādītos osm.org kartē - un tas attiecas arī uz maršrutēšanu un citiem rīkiem.
Overpass arī samērā specializēts rīks, un tagot speciāli tam nav īsti labi. Pie tam, šāds princips parādās ar jebkuru tagu - supermarket, cemetery...
Šo tēmu var apspriest arī OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
Date: 2023-11-26T18:58:54+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144371611
RSS (Nov 27 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 144512222 (Comment no. 2) by emils
Contributor: emils
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: ok
Date: 2023-11-27T17:17:36+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144512222
RSS (Nov 28 2023 at 00:32):Changeset 144514772 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
You shouldn't add bicycle=no to road segments where bicycle traffic is not forbidden with a sign or somehow else. Access tags are primarily for legal restrictions and bicycles are vehicles that follow traffic laws. As far as I know, it's perfectly legal for bikes to travel along A2 and through this intersection even if it's not safe or desired.
Date: 2023-11-27T23:01:21+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144514772
RSS (Nov 28 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 144513617 (Comment no. 2) by AleksPLV19
Contributor: AleksPLV19
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: AlkOultlet - is the correct name, this place still exists.
Date: 2023-11-28T10:14:18+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144513617
RSS (Nov 29 2023 at 12:12):Changeset 144513617 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Thanks, fixed the name
Date: 2023-11-29T10:00:51+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144513617
RSS (Dec 01 2023 at 12:12):Changeset 144652131 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Just to let you know, I removed landuse=military from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6278058121 . This location is not a military land use location.
Date: 2023-12-01T10:46:33+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144652131
RSS (Dec 01 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 144660562 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Vai šie tiešām ir brasli https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11387611475 un https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11387611454? Ortofoto izskatās pēc tipiskām caurtekām grāvjiem.
Date: 2023-12-01T15:32:45+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144660562
RSS (Dec 01 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 144652131 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: The node mentioned by Hellmap still has military=obstacle_course, which is likely incorrect. Perhaps something from the "leisure" namespace is a better fit.
Date: 2023-12-01T13:26:25+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144652131
RSS (Dec 01 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 144654745 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: As far as I understand, "Smartpost" is a brand "Itella" operates under, split it in operator/brand tags.
https://itella.ee/en/private-customer/smartpost/
Date: 2023-12-01T13:11:24+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144654745
RSS (Dec 02 2023 at 18:07):Changeset 144694641 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Paldies par šo punktu pievienošanu; vienmēr ir grūti apsekot punktus ēkās.
Gribēju pieminēt, ka nevajadzētu neko novietot vai pārvietot, pamatojoties uz to, kā tas parādās kartē. Ir daudz dažādu karšu, kuras izmanto OSM, un katrā no tām lietas var tikt zīmētas atšķirīgi. OSM ir pirmkārt datubāze, tāpēc visiem elementiem jābūt pareiziem - tostarp pēc iespējas pareizā vietā.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Paldies
Date: 2023-12-02T15:58:12+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144694641
RSS (Dec 02 2023 at 18:07):Changeset 144690459 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
I undid this edit, because you deleted the wrong element. You remove the "Valsts meža dienests" government office node. This office and this building are still here (as far as I know). The old building that was demolished and where a new one is now under construction is next to it.
Let me know if I misunderstood your intention.
Thanks
Date: 2023-12-02T14:43:14+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144690459
RSS (Dec 03 2023 at 12:10):Changeset 144715281 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Can you please clarify where exactly is this guest house is located? The node you placed is almost on top of an intersection in a park area. Is it in the building nearby? Does it have a name?
Thanks
Date: 2023-12-03T10:36:58+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144715281
RSS (Dec 04 2023 at 12:12):Changeset 144715281 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Might be a personal note for the nearby hotel.
Date: 2023-12-04T08:59:51+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144715281
RSS (Dec 09 2023 at 00:31):Changeset 144715281 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: It's been 5 days without a response, perhaps worth deleting the node?
Date: 2023-12-08T22:31:14+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144715281
RSS (Dec 09 2023 at 18:07):Changeset 144715281 (Comment no. 4) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Yes, I think it's fair to delete the node.
I am however also interested in the other 2 hotel nodes added previously. One is on top of some rural residentials and one is in a multistorey building, but nothing in Mapillary or quick search suggests an obvious hotel. These could be Airbnb-style locations, but we don't really map those and the editor would have to confirm.
Date: 2023-12-09T13:07:36+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144715281
RSS (Dec 11 2023 at 06:09):Changeset 144968108 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, ar šo izmaiņu kopu pievienots šis ceļš: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230108345 .
Ja tur ir kāds ceļš, to vajadzētu savienot ar citiem ceļiem, lai pareizi strādātu maršrutēšana.
Vēl būtu labi saprast, kas tas ir par ceļu. Varbūt tā ir taciņa, vai speciāli izveidots gājēju ceļš (piem., asfaltēts vai bruģēts)?
Date: 2023-12-11T00:51:46+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144968108
RSS (Dec 12 2023 at 00:32):Changeset 144992158 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Please do not delete roads that exist in real life, regardless if the owner allows or doesn't allow to use them. For legal access of roads, there are access tags. So, for example, access=private for a road that is restricted by land owners. Here the road was previously tagged with motor_vehicle=private, which means vehicles cannot pass here, but for example pedestrians and bicycles can. Has this changed? Your comment only mentions "drive".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Thanks
Date: 2023-12-11T22:26:49+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144992158
RSS (Dec 12 2023 at 00:32):Changeset 144994610 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Just wanted to check if I understand this correctly. What was your intention with this edit/correction?
I understand that name:etymology is for the word or term that the name is directly from, not for a lengthy description. I don't know if name:etymology:description is correct or used for that, but it's most likely not correct in the main name:etymology tag. name:etymology here would be "upe" (lv) / "river" (en).
Thanks
Date: 2023-12-11T22:20:13+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144994610
RSS (Dec 12 2023 at 00:32):Changeset 145007661 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Wanted to ask you about the access=permit here. On OSM "permit" means that anyone can normally gain a permit here, not just people who live (or work) here. Are these gates really permit-based and not just private for residents? Note that this is not the same as typical road signs "ar atļaujām", because those do not imply general public.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dpermit
Thanks
Date: 2023-12-11T22:11:34+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145007661
RSS (Dec 12 2023 at 12:12):Changeset 144994610 (Comment no. 2) by mueschel
Contributor: mueschel
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Hi,
yes, you're right. I just reverted my edits here.
Date: 2023-12-12T10:44:36+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144994610
RSS (Dec 12 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 145007661 (Comment no. 2) by kucervja
Contributor: kucervja
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Hi! Thank you for your note. These gates on both sides of the building are opened for public access with no any restriction. At least this is the current situation
Date: 2023-12-12T13:49:17+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145007661
RSS (Dec 13 2023 at 00:32):Changeset 145041036 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Thanks for your edits! I fixed a few issues and just letting you know about these.
Names should not be used as descriptions - either the feature needs a more specific tag or if it really needs an "explanation", then a description tag can be used. But the name should never be something like "bāzes stacija" or "pirts", because those are not the actual names of the features. Similarly, there are tags for things like operator=LMT or reference number, e.g. ref=155 that data consumers can use. If the name of the area or point is something like "LMT bāzes stacija "Zaiceva"", then it would be just "Zaiceva" (and may be official_name for the long name assuming it's from an official source).
You also shouldn't create unspecified/unknown site relations for objects that are already within a common area, such as farmyard or industrial. Firstly, this is redundant to the area - everything is already in it. Secondly, data consumers don't really know or process these, because the actual type of the site or what should be included is not defined in OSM. It's better to just draw an area around if it's still not there. This also means other mappers have to maintain fewer features and there aren't data redundancies. And finally, one could make sites for pretty much anything they can think of (playgrounds, schools, supermarkets, etc.) - and while this is not forbidden, it also doesn't really improve the map unless there is a larger community support and standards for such sites. At the very least, if adding a lot of such features, then it should be discussed with at least the local community.
Let me know if you have any questions. I tried to summarize a lot of stuff in a very short message.
Thanks
Date: 2023-12-12T20:31:55+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145041036
RSS (Dec 13 2023 at 18:07):Changeset 144715281 (Comment no. 5) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 5
Comment: Yeah, I don't think it makes sense to map AirBnB locations, those are located by address 99% of the time anyway.
Deleted this node.
Regarding the other nodes, would you have a chance to comment on those changesets?
Date: 2023-12-13T17:53:44+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144715281
RSS (Dec 14 2023 at 00:31):Changeset 144715281 (Comment no. 6) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 6
Comment: One of the other two was already deleted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141846834 . I deleted the other one.
Sorry, but I'm not going to waste my time on leaving yet another comment that won't be replied to.
Date: 2023-12-13T18:36:02+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144715281
RSS (Dec 14 2023 at 12:12):Changeset 126430801 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, skatos, ka te ir mēģināts pievienot Jaunbērzu adreses punktu pie ēkas, kura no oficiālās adreses ir 150 metru attālumā.
Tā kā oficiālās adreses tiek sinhronizētas automātiski, no ēkas punkts visas reizes pazuda.
Ja adresi gribētos piešķirt tai konkrētajai ēkai, laikam vērts sazināties ar pašvaldību par adreses punkta precizēšanu.
Date: 2023-12-14T09:40:30+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126430801
RSS (Dec 15 2023 at 00:32):Changeset 145107154 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Just wanted to let you know that in Latvia there is general consensus to tag ways with blue cycleway traffic signs as cycleways, rather than footways. So these sidewalks should ideally be converted to highway=cycleway + foot=designated + (+ bicycle=designated) segregated=no (or the JOSM variant, although most stuff in Latvia uses iD variant). There are certain legal traffic law distinctions between sidewalks and shared cycleways, so it's best to be exact.
I can't say for other countries without looking into it, but on OSM in general European blue cycleway signs are tagged as cycle infrastructure.
Thanks
Date: 2023-12-14T21:40:40+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145107154
RSS (Dec 15 2023 at 00:32):Changeset 126430801 (Comment no. 2) by The Kiotio
Contributor: The Kiotio
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Sveiki,
Paldies
Tā arī sapratu kad pirmo reizi adrese pazuda no mājas.
Date: 2023-12-14T19:15:56+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126430801
RSS (Dec 15 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 145107154 (Comment no. 2) by grelus
Contributor: grelus
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Thanks for clearing this and for link to latvian standards. Normaly I use JOSM tagging presets, but here I was using ID and just added "designated" bicycle tag without changing "footway" tag, so from now on I will stick to the guidelines.
Date: 2023-12-15T09:58:37+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145107154
RSS (Dec 15 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 144694641 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Jā, precīza novietošana vēlama, jo tas arī palīdz vieglāk atrast objektus.
Tas ļauj arī veidot vēl detalizētākas dažādu ēku kartes, piemēram, https://openlevelup.net/?l=0#18/56.98260/24.20382 .
Date: 2023-12-15T13:04:04+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144694641
RSS (Dec 15 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 144715281 (Comment no. 7) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 7
Comment: Hehe, all good, no worries :)
One use from changeset comments is that in the future they potentially can allow to see which users are not responding, but in this case - likely not that relevant.
Date: 2023-12-15T13:01:01+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144715281
RSS (Dec 16 2023 at 18:07):Changeset 145173138 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
As mentioned before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144715281, we'd like to know more about where exactly this guest house is located and some info about it as the node you created is in the middle of the street. I have removed the node for now pending clarification.
Thanks
Date: 2023-12-16T14:42:51+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145173138
RSS (Dec 17 2023 at 18:07):Changeset 139185150 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Vai varētu precizēt, kāds tieši it darbnīcas nosaukums? Kas ar "/" simbolu domāts - alternatīvs nosaukums? Vai "Latgalītes" arī ir nosaukumā un vai tas ir tiešām ar pēdiņām? Un kas tieši bija domāts ar operator=Jančuks - vai tas ir uzņēmuma nosaukums?
Paldies
Date: 2023-12-17T15:37:36+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139185150
RSS (Dec 20 2023 at 12:09):Changeset 145267190 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Has this path really been recently removed? It was still there mid-November after most of the works were finished. It snowed soon after, so it seems unlikely something else was done here.
Thanks
Date: 2023-12-18T22:33:12+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145267190
RSS (Dec 21 2023 at 06:09):Changeset 145307549 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Vai Staļģenes skolas ēkā tiešām ir tikai pamatskola?
No https://www.stalgenesskola.lv/lv/kontakti/ un https://www.jelgavasnovads.lv/lv/strukturvieniba/stalgenes-pamatskola-0 izskatās, ka tur tomēr ir arī vidusskola.
Date: 2023-12-21T01:32:42+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145307549
RSS (Dec 21 2023 at 12:11):Changeset 145344378 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Thanks for your changes!
However, I had to correct the waterway back to a stream. This is not a river in OSM tagging sense, regardless of its historical name or width or historical local designation. Many semi-artificial streams, even based on historical streambeds and riverbeds are only streams nowadays. This one simply semi-artificially router the water around developed areas. To add, a river cannot terminate in a waterway that is lesser than itself. And this stream ends up in a canal running parallel to the dam. If it had the characteristics of a river, it would end up in Daugava or overflow otherwise.
Thanks
Date: 2023-12-21T10:07:03+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145344378
RSS (Dec 28 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 145438488 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Could you please clarify what makes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389409524 a service road? Does it lead to some new location that isn't mapped yet? It looks like it's in the middle of a forest.
Similarly, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454502769
Date: 2023-12-23T17:01:32+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145438488
RSS (Dec 28 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 145398766 (Comment no. 5) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 5
Comment: Indeed, please note that we may not use data from any other map unless it has been explicitly allowed.
If other maps are used, it risks having all your contributions reverted.
Please see paragraph 1 in https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms .
Also from https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome :
"Unless you have special permission, don't copy from online or paper maps."
Date: 2023-12-22T18:34:48+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145398766
RSS (Dec 28 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 140627258 (Comment no. 2) by Mister_R2
Contributor: Mister_R2
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: When I created this change, I had walked in the forest I did see trenches with many other things I confirmed it with some old USSR stuff laying around.
Date: 2023-12-22T06:50:16+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140627258
RSS (Dec 29 2023 at 00:25):Changeset 140627258 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: I guess the question was whether https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1203896584 is mistagged as waterway=river - perhaps it should be barrier=ditch, military=trench?
Date: 2023-12-28T21:20:42+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140627258
RSS (Dec 29 2023 at 18:08):Changeset 145663908 (Comment no. 3) by andrisl
Contributor: andrisl
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Runa ir par noklusējuma karti, kas rādās, atverot https://www.lvmgeo.lv/kartes. Tur rāda, ka to ielu sauc Ganību iela, taču kadastrs.lv kartē tā tiešām ir saukta kā Pīlādžu iela.
Date: 2023-12-29T17:47:12+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145663908
RSS (Dec 30 2023 at 00:30):Changeset 145663908 (Comment no. 4) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Pirmās trīs kartes izmanto Jāņa Sētu. Noklusējuma karte ir atkarīga no browsera un uzstādījumiem, bet es pieņemu, ka varbūt atveras pirmā (pelēkās ielas), kur fona karte ir vairāku avotu salīmēta. Tā kā tur iekļauts no JS, tad to arī izmantot nevar.
Vēlreiz piebildīšu, ka tā karte var būt novecojusi - nav zināms, cik bieži viņi to fona slāni atjauno un datus labo. VZD ielu līnijas ir ļoti šķības, tāpēc to kādam tik un tā jāzīmē. Tāpēc visas tās kartes ir ar zināmu novecojumu un pareizība nav garantēta. Nav arī zināms, no kurienes oriģinālie dati - VZD, pašu pētīts, pašvaldību terplāni... Tie var būt ar gadu desmitu kļūdām un izmaiņām.
Date: 2023-12-29T18:18:40+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145663908
RSS (Jan 01 2024 at 00:35):Changeset 145745543 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Jā, bet šis ir sezonāli. Ar surface=mud apzīmē ceļus, kas ir šādā stāvoklī visu gadu, vai vismaz lielāko daļu gada. Pašlaik tā izskatās puse izbraukāto meža ceļu pie ziemas atkušņiem/sasalumiem. To nevar izmantot "galvenā" seguma noteikšanā. Vasarā šis gabals ir "normāls": https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1306604086742357&focus=photo
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dmud
Date: 2023-12-31T20:32:27+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145745543
RSS (Jan 01 2024 at 00:35):Changeset 145743517 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
railway=crossing apzīmē vietas paredzētas dzelzceļu līniju šķērsošanai. Latvijā dzelzceļu drīkst šķērsot tikai tam speciāli paredzētās vietās. Tādēļ neoficiālās vietās kā šeit būtu jāliek crossing=no.
Date: 2023-12-31T20:03:36+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145743517
RSS (Jan 02 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 145728759 (Comment no. 2) by Maris33
Contributor: Maris33
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: https://www.1188.lv/satiksme/saraksti/cesu-ao/ligatne/105255/101824/diena/2024-01-03 or https://transitfeeds.com/p/valsts-sia-autotransporta-direkcija/1227/latest/routes?q=5084
Date: 2024-01-02T17:05:39+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145728759
RSS (Jan 03 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 145728759 (Comment no. 3) by iav
Contributor: iav
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Thank you!
Date: 2024-01-02T20:14:25+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145728759
RSS (Jan 03 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 145267190 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Heya, any thoughts on this, was it indeed removed?
Date: 2024-01-03T17:47:53+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145267190
RSS (Jan 04 2024 at 00:32):Changeset 145267190 (Comment no. 14) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 14
Comment: Thanks!
This location is fairly detailed, so including sidewalks as separate ways is generally preferred. At least, you shouldn't remove sidewalks once they are drawn. This one is admittedly a useless one, but it still exists, is not like the surrounding grass, has a kerb and the service road crosses it (technically, pedestrians have right of way). So it's still information, even if it's not exactly high priority.
Date: 2024-01-03T21:43:37+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145267190
RSS (Jan 07 2024 at 06:08):Changeset 145969855 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, izskatās, ka šajā izmaiņu kopā mājvārdi duplicēti visām ēkām saimniecībā. Tā kā adreses tiek importētas no oficiālajiem datiem, šāda duplicēšana nav vispāratzīta prakse.
Vai ir kāds īpašs iemesls šādai duplicēšanai?
Date: 2024-01-07T01:40:20+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145969855
RSS (Jan 07 2024 at 12:10):Changeset 145969855 (Comment no. 9) by drtzdrfh
Contributor: drtzdrfh
Discussion Comment No.: 9
Comment: Es jau laboju šobrīd
Date: 2024-01-07T11:20:06+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145969855
RSS (Jan 07 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 145989486 (Comment no. 2) by drtzdrfh
Contributor: drtzdrfh
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Nē, kļūdaties jūs, reālā pasaulē arí pastāv šis, varat aiziet un pats parbaudit
Date: 2024-01-07T15:43:15+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145989486
RSS (Jan 09 2024 at 12:12):Changeset 146047262 (Comment no. 2) by Cucazer
Contributor: Cucazer
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Yes, this changeset is related to that note, thank you for linking
Date: 2024-01-09T11:46:13+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146047262
RSS (Jan 15 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 146281276 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
The address here wasn't properly formatted, but the attempted "LV" prefix as such in the postcode was correct. The postcode format in Latvia is "LV-####" as seen on nearby POIs. We have an automated process updating addresses, so they are all standardized across the country.
I have fixed this one, so just letting you know.
Thanks
Date: 2024-01-15T16:03:01+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146281276
RSS (Jan 16 2024 at 00:32):Changeset 146281276 (Comment no. 2) by mtmail
Contributor: mtmail
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Thank a lot! The https://nominatim.org/qa/ tool uses "(LV-)?(dddd)" and I didn't notice the Lv->LV error. I checked with Overpass API now and indeed the whole country used the prefix, I'll get the regular expression updated.
Date: 2024-01-15T19:03:54+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146281276
RSS (Jan 18 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 146282395 (Comment no. 1) by Cucazer
Contributor: Cucazer
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Ooh, I've always stumbled upon these points and wondered whether these really belong here. Thanks for addressing my concerns!
Btw, that knotted area in the middle is some kind of MTB park with trails and jumps, as I remember it from more than 10 years ago.
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146282395
Date: 2024-01-18T15:01:48+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146282395
RSS (Jan 20 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 140496109 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Yeah, you are probably right. I didn't really look closer, but looks at the well nearby and what looks like outgasing pipes, it's probably a pumping/life station or something. Not sure though, so removed power tag.
Date: 2024-01-20T13:10:04+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140496109
RSS (Jan 23 2024 at 00:33):Changeset 146540865 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Čau!
Vai šo celiņu nojauca/neuzbūvēja? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207110416/history
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=199061969891421&focus=photo
Date: 2024-01-22T21:05:19+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146540865
RSS (Jan 23 2024 at 12:12):Changeset 137825274 (Comment no. 1) by artuuurs
Contributor: artuuurs
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki! Kāpēc uzlikāt piste:abandoned? Trase tur ir katru ziemu - gan pērn, gan šogad. Vasarā, protams, nav. :)
Date: 2024-01-23T11:38:57+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137825274
RSS (Jan 24 2024 at 12:12):Changeset 146587404 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Please don't remove nodes that are address points, because these come from the official cadaster VZD data and are correct as far as addressing is concerned.
If the owners of the property want to remove this second address and for this to be reflected in various maps, then they need to contact VZD.
In addition, the addresses in Latvia are updated automatically, so any changes to such points would get undone anyway.
Thanks
Date: 2024-01-24T10:24:11+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146587404
RSS (Jan 26 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 146702653 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, šis droši vien nav tourism=viewpoint - droši vien domāta personīga piezīme?
Iespējams, Organic Maps aplikācija (maps.me forks) varētu būt ērtāka lietošanā šādu personīgu piezīmju ziņā.
Date: 2024-01-26T12:15:59+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146702653
RSS (Jan 27 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 146702653 (Comment no. 2) by Alex Kritenko
Contributor: Alex Kritenko
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Labdien. Jā, tā bij personīga piezīme. Droši var dzēst to viewpoint. Paldies
Date: 2024-01-26T20:00:09+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146702653
RSS (Jan 28 2024 at 00:33):Changeset 138051781 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Ups, es to gribēju nokomentēt https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146727651, bet ne to elementu izvēlējos :upside_down:
Date: 2024-01-27T21:11:17+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138051781
RSS (Jan 28 2024 at 12:09):Changeset 113089504 (Comment no. 1) by Mateusz Konieczny
Contributor: Mateusz Konieczny
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello!
You used
artwork_type=buste
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7396275566
Have you maybe meant
artwork_type=bust
?
I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).
Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Date: 2024-01-28T09:46:31+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113089504
RSS (Jan 29 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 113089504 (Comment no. 2) by Fabe56
Contributor: Fabe56
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Nice catch, my OSM UI is in french and by list propose Buste. Looks like it does not match it with the English term: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:memorial=buste
Date: 2024-01-29T15:08:59+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113089504
RSS (Jan 30 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 146540865 (Comment no. 2) by UrSuS
Contributor: UrSuS
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Es atgriezu, Nepamanīju :)
Date: 2024-01-29T18:29:20+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146540865
RSS (Jan 30 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 138051781 (Comment no. 3) by UrSuS
Contributor: UrSuS
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Paldies! Nejauši salauzu :)
Date: 2024-01-29T18:25:12+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138051781
RSS (Jan 30 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 146820290 (Comment no. 3) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Thanks for clarifying! A couple points.
You should not make any changes to OSM to "fix" some other router (or navigator, map, app, etc.). OSM contains the data and it should be correct and accurate. If another application is not using it correctly - it should be fixed there.
You say that GraphHopper cannot create a route. Well, it sounds like it shouldn't - this road is not accessible to anything that is not buses. Therefore, motor_vehicle=yes would not be correct.
Date: 2024-01-30T16:06:26+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146820290
RSS (Jan 30 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 146794405 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Mainot tegus bez apsekošanas lūdzu būt uzmanīgam. Varbūt liela daļa tiešām ir pareizi. Bet ne visi tunnel=yes piemēri ir tunnel=building_passage. Piemēram, šeit visi celiņi ir vienkārši covered=yes https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=655059980128647&focus=photo . Šeit nemaz vienas sienas nav un arī ir covered=yes https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1292316544904813&focus=photo . Šeit dekoratīva konstrukcija nepareizi kā ēka iezīmēta https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1256743364966508&focus=photo . Noteikti ir daudz tādi piemēri, kur nevar zināt, ko īsti autors bija domājis un kāpēc ir nepareizi. Nomainot šādi tegus rodas priekšstats, ka tie tagad ir iezīmēti pareizi, bet faktiski šādi kļūda tiek "noslēpta".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F
Date: 2024-01-30T14:42:03+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146794405
RSS (Jan 31 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 146820290 (Comment no. 6) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 6
Comment: BTW, it might be more convenient to discuss this in the OSM community chat, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
Date: 2024-01-31T11:58:38+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146820290
RSS (Jan 31 2024 at 18:06):Changeset 146885671 (Comment no. 2) by Atalanttore
Contributor: Atalanttore
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Hi
See https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_deutschsprachigen_Stra%C3%9Fennamen_in_Riga
Date: 2024-01-31T15:27:07+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146885671
RSS (Feb 02 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 146924504 (Comment no. 1) by Tomas Straupis
Contributor: Tomas Straupis
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello, please do not change waterbody tagging in Lithuania, you're damaging good data. I will revert your changes in Lithuania.
Date: 2024-02-02T06:57:55+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146924504
RSS (Feb 02 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 146924998 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Lūdzu beidz redaktorā spiest fix/upgrade pogu, ja tu neesi uzmanīgi paskatījies, ko tieši tu "labo". Tas, ka redaktors rāda paziņojumu nenozīmē, ka tā ir vienmēr kļūda.
Tas nav seamark https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763125934
Ar layer elementu pārklāšanos automātiski nelabo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116239212 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770603329 Kā iepriekš minēts, tādā veidā tu tikai noslēp reālo problēmu, nevis reāli kaut ko izlabo.
Šādās vietās noexit=no neliek https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11237573474
Šis bija marked crossing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9003554752
building=roof nav automātiski jāliek layer=1, ja tas ne ar vienu citu elementu nekonfliktē
Date: 2024-02-02T17:13:05+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146924998
RSS (Feb 03 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 146993367 (Comment no. 1) by andrisl
Contributor: andrisl
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Ja jau layer variants nav derīgs, tad kāpēc ID to visoār piedāvā kā risinājumu? Personīgi es neredzu tajā problēmu. Protams, nenoliedzami, covered=yes uz highway variants arī ir derīgs.
Date: 2024-02-02T23:42:45+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146993367
RSS (Feb 03 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 146992910 (Comment no. 1) by andrisl
Contributor: andrisl
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Pieliku noexit tagus, lai atrisinātu almost-junction problēmas, kas ID rādījās. Izdzēšot tos, tu atkal šīs problēmas atjaunoji. Kāds ir tavs risinājums šai šīm almost-junction problēmām?
Date: 2024-02-02T23:33:20+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146992910
RSS (Feb 03 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 146924998 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Iespējams, par šādām izmaiņām vērts apspriesties OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
iD redaktors tiešām ar saviem ieteikumiem pārāk bieži samulsina lietotājus.
Date: 2024-02-02T21:41:49+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146924998
RSS (Feb 03 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 146980122 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, paldies par OSM uzlabošanu.
Mazliet palaboju tagus, tai saitā nodzēsu website tagu - tam bija nepareizs SSL sertifikāts, kurš pāradresēja uz kādu Lietuvas domēna lapu, kura savukārt pāradresēja uz kādu Instagram lapu, kura nestrādāja.
Iezīmēju arī dažas ēkas šeit, lai gan no ortofoto grūti saprast izkārtojumu.
Arī piebraucamos ceļus neriskēju iezīmēt pagaidām.
Ja ir vēlme turpināt ar kartes papildināšanu, laipni lūgti OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
Date: 2024-02-02T21:37:58+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146980122
RSS (Feb 03 2024 at 06:07):Changeset 146992910 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Es te ar skatu no malas - man nav viedokļa par konkrēto tagu, bet kopumā:
"It is important to understand that warnings are just warnings, they should be examined and fixed where possible but never at the cost of introducing wrong data. Some validators warnings are generated for valid data. Often in such cases validator code should be fixed, not OSM data. Sometimes false positives are unavoidable."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance
Date: 2024-02-03T02:29:26+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146992910
RSS (Feb 03 2024 at 12:10):Changeset 146993367 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: iD nav tik gudrs redaktors un par risinājumu bieži piedāvā ļoti vienkāršus risinājumus, jo tie der 95% gadījumu. Bet šeit ir viens no tiem piemēriem, kur ir iekartēts daudz un smalki, bet ne līdz galam un ar nepilnībām. iD tādas nianses nesaprot (un neviens rīks tādas nekad līdz galam nesapratīs).
layer variants var būt derīgs, bet tam tad ir jābūt pareizi pret citiem elementiem. Varbūt te arī var uzlikt tikai layer=1, ja tas visu pareizi atrisina. Bet galvenais šeit ir, ja tu to sauc par izlabošanu, tad tu esi reāli sapratis situāciju un to izlabojis ar pamatojumu. Bet tā kā šis labojums bija no lielas izmaiņas visādās vietās, man nešķiet, ka tu šeit pārbaudīji līdz galam:
Vai tu ņēmi vērā, ka šeit ir building:part=roof? Kāpēc tam nav layer? Vai nevajag arī building:part=retail, kur savienojas entrance=shop?
Vai tas, ka šeit highway=pedestrian un highway=footway ir vienā līmenī, bet footway is ar covered=yes, bet pedestrian tāda nav? Tātad tie nemaz teorētiski savā starpā nav maršrutējami.
Vai highway=pedestrian vispār būtu jāsavienojas ar building:part=roof, ja tie ir dažādos līmeņos?
Te ir jālabo daudz ilgāk par iD piedāvāto risināju un es pat pateikt uzreiz nevaru, kāds variants būtu precīzākais. Tāpēc arī tā "problēma" šeit ir - jo kādam tas ir uzmanīgi jākartē. Man personīgi nav bijis laika tam pagaidām. Šeit pat piezīme atstāta https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2017571 . Nospiest "tag as higher" es un citi jau varēja sen, bet tas nav pareizais risinājums šeit.
Date: 2024-02-03T11:14:29+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146993367
RSS (Feb 03 2024 at 12:10):Changeset 146992910 (Comment no. 3) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Kā jau minēts, tās nav automātiski problēmas. Tas, ka iD to rāda kā "warning" (un "warning" nav "error"), nenozīmē, ka tos nepieciešams labot. (Tur pat blakus iD ir arī "ignore" poga.) Ja tu atvērsi JOSM redaktoru, tur būtu vēl simtiem "problēmu", pie tam tās ne tikai nesakrīt ar iD, bet redaktori vispār piedāvā katrs savu "risinājumu". Un ir vēl daudz visādu rīku, kur var sameklēt bezgalīgas "problēmas", piemēram https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ , https://maproulette.org , https://nominatim.org/qa/ utt. Neviens no tiem nav simtprocentīgi labojams. Daudzi ir pašsaprotami, bet ir pietiekami piemēru, kur ir jāsaprot "problēmas" iemesls un vai konkrētā situācijā tā vispār ir problēma.
Konkrēti šeit - noexit is tegs, kas domāts, lai citiem kartētājiem norādītu neviennozīmīgās situācijās, ka ceļi nesavienojas un ka tā nav kartēšanas kļūda. Ja starp ceļiem ir iezīmēta barjera, tad tas ir standarta viennozīmīgs gadījums, kad noexit nav nepieciešams ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noexit%3Dyes#Alternatives ). Varbūt ir argumenti arī likt šeit to noexit=yes. Bet tad tas ir jādara saprotot tega nozīmi un lietojumu un pamatojot šo izmaiņu, bet nevis automātiski.
Date: 2024-02-03T10:48:27+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146992910
RSS (Feb 05 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 121179913 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi, just FYI - this relation was partially duplicating https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/162396 , removed it.
Date: 2024-02-04T21:12:54+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121179913
RSS (Feb 05 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 147086061 (Comment no. 5) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 5
Comment: Do you mean examples of area:highway tag?
Date: 2024-02-05T16:39:41+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147086061
RSS (Feb 07 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 147166939 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Liels paldies par kartes papildināšanu. Nedaudz pielaboju darba laiku, lai tas atbilstu informācijas strukturēšanas prasībām.
Date: 2024-02-07T12:40:37+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147166939
RSS (Feb 08 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 146858411 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Hi!
In general, yes. There is a big mess of these in Latvia, so most are not yet fixed. I was only looking through recent edits when I changed these because these were the two I saw. I didn't check around to see if there are more around here. I think they can safely be changed too.
Kind of like "Veikals Aibe" would just be "Aibe". The difference here is that "Pirmskolas izglītības iestāde Xxx" is the official name, so that can be placed in the official_name tag, so the full name doesn't get lost. For "Privātā ...", there is also operator:type=private as opposed to (I think) operator:type=government.
Cheers
Date: 2024-02-08T13:24:47+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146858411
RSS (Feb 09 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 147247856 (Comment no. 2) by Colbertson
Contributor: Colbertson
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: uz dienvidiem\*
Date: 2024-02-09T17:56:33+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147247856
RSS (Feb 11 2024 at 12:09):Changeset 147292141 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Izlaboju https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2540381967 . Iespējams softa kļūda?
Date: 2024-02-11T11:26:37+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147292141
RSS (Feb 11 2024 at 12:09):Changeset 147178123 (Comment no. 1) by ronery-mapper
Contributor: ronery-mapper
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Fence removal should be reverted. My bad.
Someone plz help, I have paws :(
Date: 2024-02-11T06:06:01+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147178123
RSS (Feb 11 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 147325442 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Paldies par pieturu izmaiņu pievienošanu.
Pievēršu uzmanību, ka ref tegs nav domāts maršruta numuriem, bet pašas pieturvietas numuram/identifikatoram. Latvijā faktiski pieturām numuru nekur nav un Rīgas Satiksmei ir tikai kaut kādi iekšējie identifikatori, kas nav norādīti pieturvietu plāksnītēs/informācijā.
Lai pievienotu pieturu maršrutiem, tie ir jāveido ar maršrutu relācijām https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dbus , piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11312649 . Tas gan ir sarežģīts process.
Ja nav iespējas tādus zīmēt, tad var atstāt šajā vietā piezīmi, ka trūkst/šķībi maršruti, lai kāds to izlabotu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes .
Es šajā vietā jau salaboju 13., 20. un 63. maršrutus.
Date: 2024-02-11T15:25:26+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147325442
RSS (Feb 11 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 147178123 (Comment no. 3) by ronery-mapper
Contributor: ronery-mapper
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Thanks!
Date: 2024-02-11T14:36:47+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147178123
RSS (Feb 11 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 141987508 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Please do not remove or split paths that cross a railway if they are actually used and exist. This breaks routing. An illegal crossing should be tagged with crossing=no to prevent routing that does not allow rail crossings outside designated locations. But nothing here physically blocks access to the crossing. There are hundreds of examples like this across Latvia.
Thanks
Date: 2024-02-11T14:30:25+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141987508
RSS (Feb 12 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 141987508 (Comment no. 2) by giggls
Contributor: giggls
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: While it might be common to map illegal crossings in Lithuania it is definitely not in my country.
This said if you actually \do\ map such stuff which I still do not consider a good idea please tag them at least something like access=no.
Regards
Sven
Date: 2024-02-11T19:59:04+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141987508
RSS (Feb 12 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 141987508 (Comment no. 6) by giggls
Contributor: giggls
Discussion Comment No.: 6
Comment: Well access tag is about what is allowed to do not about what is possible to do.
I do not know about the legal status of crossing railways in Latvia but it is completely illegal to cross a railway at spots without a corresponding traffic-signs in my country (Germany).
A very similar example would be tracks and paths ending at a motorway where it is strictly illegal to use them for the general public.
An example would be this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106966611
Regards
Sven
Date: 2024-02-12T11:45:10+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141987508
RSS (Feb 12 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 147318262 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: This change might not stick, as the official address seems to be assigned to the building right to southeast, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1249444948/history .
Addresses are automatically synchronised in Latvia, and that will likely remove address from this building and assign it to the SE one.
This could also be useful to discuss in the OSM Latvian community chat, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
Date: 2024-02-12T11:23:40+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147318262
RSS (Feb 12 2024 at 18:06):Changeset 141987508 (Comment no. 7) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 7
Comment: Very briefly - it is de facto allowed to cross here in Latvia.
To elaborate, the law talks (somewhat ambiguously) about crossing railways at designated crossings and goes into detail about what a "crossing" is and what "dangerous rail sections" are. But it's all very legalese and ambiguous and hardly enforced. So this path here is definitely not a dedicated crossing in a legal sense. But no one is going get fined or stopped for using it. In fact, it's common practice and the only reasonable location to cross in this area. In other words, it's a de-facto crossing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Mismatch_between_law_and_de_facto_status . These used to be untagged or tagged with railway=crossing. But we now choose to tag these as crossing=no rather than railway=crossing to follow its legal status. This already restricts routing. But we don't add access=no, because this significantly hinders pedestrian and cyclist routing in Latvia (this wouldn't be nearly as much of a problem in, say, Germany, where railway crossings/bridges/tunnels are common).
In contrast, here is an example of an informal crossing, but where there \is\ an actual sign stating "railway crossing not allowed"
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=298472319457894&focus=photo . So here access=no is appropriate even though this crossing is commonly used.
Date: 2024-02-12T13:14:24+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141987508
RSS (Feb 13 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 141987508 (Comment no. 9) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 9
Comment: Yeah, there is a pretty vast difference between German and post-Soviet infrastructure and culture. If we didn't map these places as crossings, we would be missing half the crossings in the country. I imagine if you didn't map them in Germany, no one would even notice.
And, to be fair, this wasn't mapped as a crossing - previously, it had no tags and now it's an even "stronger" crossing=no. And the way itself is a path and not a footway. Routers should really be accounting for these and giving them a low priority. While crossing=no is not a prominent tag, it's certainly not a new tag. May be some day we'll get consensus and a standard scheme for such locations. Unfortunately, there are very few mappers in countries like Latvia while countries like Germany have the most mappers and lead many discussions, so consequently a lot of it is biased towards what you would find in countries like Germany. And if there aren't any local examples, then it would be difficult to get actionable opinions for such examples due to how much background info is required (as this changeset indeed shows).
I'm still fixing many crossings like this that are tagged as full railway=crossing, which mappers commonly add. That's how ingrained in everyone's mind it is that crossing railways anywhere is basically the norm. I suppose it's a culture shock for many people. But it's not illegal and what little legal "guidance" is given is not enforced or treated seriously.
For this place, a road bike profile would have given you the small path along the highway https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1665375620555465&focus=photo . But this location really has no good alternatives. I cycle here myself often and short of going along roads, there really aren't any good options. Unfortunately, that's the case for a lot of infrastructure in Latvia. Routers generally have a hard time because footways and paths end abruptly, don't lead anywhere, lead through terrible locations, etc. And we don't have that many mappers to maintain it all either... but I digress.
Date: 2024-02-12T20:31:23+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141987508
RSS (Feb 13 2024 at 12:10):Changeset 147247856 (Comment no. 5) by Colbertson
Contributor: Colbertson
Discussion Comment No.: 5
Comment: Jā, cik nu korekti var bez ortofoto
Date: 2024-02-13T11:18:02+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147247856
RSS (Feb 13 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 147415535 (Comment no. 1) by Colbertson
Contributor: Colbertson
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: tukums\*
Date: 2024-02-13T16:08:07+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147415535
RSS (Feb 14 2024 at 00:32):Changeset 147374766 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Par highway=motorway_junction nosaukumiem - name un ref ir paredzēti paša krustojuma/sadalījuma nosaukumam/numuram, bet nevis uz plāksnes norādītajiem virzieniem. Virzienus norāda ar destination uz tālākajiem/atejošajiem ceļiem. Attālumu arī noteikti name neliek, bet var uz atejošā ceļa kā destination:distance. Cik zinu, Latvijā nevienā šādā "krustojumā" nav nedz numura nedz nosaukuma uz plāksnes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway_junction#Name_and_number
Pie mums tādi gandrīz nav kartēti, bet destination piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7930427
Date: 2024-02-13T19:28:29+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147374766
RSS (Feb 16 2024 at 00:29):Changeset 107012570 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Nē, tie palika kā kopija no ceļa, kuru sadalīju. Nepamanīju/nenodzēsu tegus.
Date: 2024-02-15T20:40:02+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107012570
RSS (Feb 17 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 147442859 (Comment no. 3) by Eugene G
Contributor: Eugene G
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147547917
Date: 2024-02-16T20:31:49+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147442859
RSS (Feb 17 2024 at 12:09):Changeset 147442859 (Comment no. 4) by Colbertson
Contributor: Colbertson
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Looks good, thanks for the quick responses
Date: 2024-02-17T08:50:38+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147442859
RSS (Feb 20 2024 at 00:29):Changeset 147667040 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Vai šajā vietā tiešām ir tilts nevis caurteka? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1252560895
Date: 2024-02-19T22:18:38+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147667040
RSS (Feb 20 2024 at 00:29):Changeset 147640260 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Lūdzu nelikt nepiemērotu ceļu klasifikāciju. Šādi sīki vietējie ceļi nekādīgi nav highway=secondary.
Jau iepriekš vairākreiz lūgts izmantot izsmeļošu izmaiņas komentāru nekā "ceļš", kas neko nepaskaidro.
Izmaiņas pagaidām atcēlu.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Ce%C4%BCi_un_ielas
Date: 2024-02-19T22:13:51+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147640260
RSS (Feb 20 2024 at 00:29):Changeset 147639678 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Ja te uz visām ielām ir ātrums 20, vai te nav dzīvojamā zona? Vai arī vienkārši 20 zona?
Date: 2024-02-19T21:58:38+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147639678
RSS (Feb 20 2024 at 00:29):Changeset 147654898 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, paldies par kartes uzlabošanu.
Vai šo objektu vietējie tā sauc, vai arī tas vairāk kā apraksts?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1252427242
Date: 2024-02-19T21:34:50+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147654898
RSS (Feb 20 2024 at 00:29):Changeset 147665579 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, pieņemu, ka šis nav oficiāls nosaukums, bet vietējs - vai pareizi?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11641378695
Date: 2024-02-19T21:04:42+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147665579
RSS (Feb 20 2024 at 18:10):Changeset 147667040 (Comment no. 3) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Skaidrs, paldies par precizējumu. Es izlaboju/pārmainīju.
Date: 2024-02-20T15:41:02+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147667040
RSS (Feb 20 2024 at 18:10):Changeset 147654898 (Comment no. 2) by Emils Mikelsons
Contributor: Emils Mikelsons
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Jā, šo mežu vietējie sauc par Birzīti.
Date: 2024-02-20T15:28:30+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147654898
RSS (Feb 20 2024 at 18:10):Changeset 147665579 (Comment no. 2) by Emils Mikelsons
Contributor: Emils Mikelsons
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Sveiks. Mākoņkalns ir officiāls nosaukums jau kopš 2021 gada :)
Date: 2024-02-20T15:26:51+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147665579
RSS (Feb 21 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 147667040 (Comment no. 4) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Par to, kā [labāk] kartēt - noteikti var vaicāt Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā: https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
Date: 2024-02-21T00:04:59+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147667040
RSS (Feb 21 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 147665579 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Oho, varbūt to varam uzreiz tagos norādīt - vai ir kādi avoti šim?
Date: 2024-02-21T13:20:25+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147665579
RSS (Feb 21 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 147654898 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Paldies, tehniski tas varbūt vairāk iederētos loc_name, bet gan jau ka pagaidām šādi būs labi :)
Date: 2024-02-21T13:16:00+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147654898
RSS (Feb 23 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 147583232 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Who is the operator of this bot? Where can we see community discussion/approval of this automated bot and the list of (approved) tasks that it performs as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?
Thanks
Date: 2024-02-23T16:40:05+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147583232
RSS (Feb 23 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 147709461 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Šī drošvien būs stāvvieta (amenity=parking) nevis viena transportlīdzekļa apstāšanās vieta (amenity=parking_space).
Es to jau izlaboju.
Date: 2024-02-23T13:18:42+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147709461
RSS (Feb 23 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 147800719 (Comment no. 2) by Bolt026
Contributor: Bolt026
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Hi,
Thank you for letting me know and also for your fix! I will keep this in mind for future edits.
Have a great day!
Date: 2024-02-23T13:14:38+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147800719
RSS (Feb 23 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 147808038 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Zīmējot laukumus kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042055081 jāņem vērā, ka pie tiem pievienotus ceļus nevajadzētu atstāt tikai līdz robežai, jo tad maršrutēšana vairs pareizi nestrādās. Pašiem ceļiem ir jābūt arī savstarpēji savienotiem, lai tie pareizi maršrutētu no viena uz otri, jo laukums apzīmē fiziskas dimensijas, bet ne loģiskos savienojumus.
Vēl pievērsīšu uzmanību, ka šis drošvien nav place=square, bet drīzāk neliels laukumiņš gājēju atpūtai https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian ?
Es šeit no ortofoto pielaboju, cerams, ka pareizi.
Paldies
Date: 2024-02-23T12:39:02+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147808038
RSS (Feb 24 2024 at 00:28):Changeset 147808038 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Kā arī varbūt ir vēlme apspriest šādas tēmas OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā :)
https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com
Date: 2024-02-23T20:26:57+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147808038
RSS (Feb 24 2024 at 00:28):Changeset 147800719 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Thank you for the quick reply, greatly appreciated :)
Date: 2024-02-23T20:24:52+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147800719
RSS (Feb 24 2024 at 12:09):Changeset 141390169 (Comment no. 1) by Pikse
Contributor: Pikse
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Why country border was separated from Gauja centerline here and in related changesets?
Country border no longer accurately follows the border provided on Estonian Land Board (Maa-amet) maps. In OSM editors you can check this using e.g. Maa-amet Basic Map, or the following custom imagery: http://tiles.maaamet.ee/tm/tms/1.0.0/kaart@GMC/{z}/{x}/{-y}.png
I didn't find the official border description at the moment but presumably the border is supposed to follow river centerline, and Maa-amet maps are correct. Last time that I check this in OSM, a year ago or so, river centerline along the border was also mapped fairly accurately.
I don't quite get what exactly was supposed to be improved here, and what sources did you use. In changeset tags above you refer to external map layers that don't even include the country border. It looks as if you used some outdated map for country border, which is especially evident around river meanders like the one in this location:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/57.60102/26.27293
Date: 2024-02-24T10:48:21+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141390169
RSS (Feb 24 2024 at 12:09):Changeset 147839967 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki vēlreiz,
Grāvji mežā šeit visticamāk būs waterway=ditch nevis waterway=drain. Drain ir ūdens novade ar specializētu izbūvi un parasti izbūvētām apmalēm.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain / https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dditch
Date: 2024-02-24T10:27:22+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147839967
RSS (Feb 25 2024 at 12:10):Changeset 141390169 (Comment no. 2) by Pikse
Contributor: Pikse
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: I now see you made the country border follow LGIA data, as shown e.g. here:
https://vietvardi.lgia.gov.lv/vv/mv_lgiamap5n?p_x=635898&p_y=386533&p_id=95586
Though, I would still consider it unlikely that the actual border is described as a set of coordinates that follow all these old river bends (their former shape) rather than it being described simply to follow the river centerline. Unless you have the exact border description in hand that suggests otherwise, I would consider the LGIA data outdated or less accurate, and I would restore the country border as provided on Maa-amet maps.
Also, as long as the border exactly follows the river centerline, I believe it is reasonable to keep this data conflated in OSM.
Date: 2024-02-25T09:42:27+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141390169
RSS (Feb 25 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 147864227 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Gribēju pieminēt ka OSM izpratnē landuse=meadow ir pļava paredzēta ganībām un/vai zāles audzēšanai. Vienkārša pļava, kur zāle netiek speciāli audzēta un regulāri pļauta/ganīta, būs natural=grassland. Piemēram, visticamāk https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1254358108 ir grassland.
Līdzīgi,
landuse=farmland ir zeme, kur tiek stādīta labība, bet ne vienkārši pašaugošas zāles audzēšanai. Visticamāk https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1254358107 ir meadow.
Vēl pieminēšu, ka landuse=grass ir maziem, koptiem zāles gabaliem (piemēram pilsētās, privātīpašumos, skolu teritorijās, u.c.). Šādi zāles pleķīši https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1254352484 visticamāk ir grassland.
Date: 2024-02-25T16:43:01+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147864227
RSS (Feb 27 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 147828318 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Mainot ielu nosaukumus, lūdzu to darīt uzmanīgāk. Vairāki gabali/posmi palika nenomainīti. Šeit visiem gabaliem ir palikuši name:etymology:wikidata=Q649, kas norāda nosaukuma izcelsmi uz Maskavu. Dzēšot veco, jaunā nosaukuma etimoloģija nav pielikta. Ņemot vērā populāro un zināmo nosaukumu (un ņemot vērā, ka adreses nekur vēl nav nomainītas), ir jāatstāj arī old_name. Nav nomainīts nosaukums un citas vērtības ielas relācijā/maršrutā: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15667760 .
Arī mainīt vajadzētu nevis ar tik daudzām mazām izmaiņām pa posmiem, bet vienā kopīgā izmaiņā, lai to varētu arī pārbaudīt un izlabot kopīgi.
Iesaku nesteigties ar šādām būtiskām izmaiņām un vislabāk iepriekš konsultēties, ja nav zināmi visi iespējamie sīkumi.
Es šos posmus salaboju.
Date: 2024-02-27T16:32:04+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147828318
RSS (Feb 28 2024 at 00:29):Changeset 147989681 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Please map local melioration system ditches as ditches rather than canals.
I also repaired an administrative boundary that you changed into a waterway in 138869725, which then caused more errors.
Thanks
Date: 2024-02-27T23:37:19+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147989681
RSS (Feb 28 2024 at 00:29):Changeset 147864227 (Comment no. 2) by Mariss Zigats
Contributor: Mariss Zigats
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Skaidrs. Šo info sev saglabāju. Paskatīšos savus nesenos labojumus, lai saliktu pareizi.
Date: 2024-02-27T19:36:49+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147864227
RSS (Feb 28 2024 at 00:29):Changeset 147828318 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Noteikti laipni aicināti apspriest OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā :)
https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com
Date: 2024-02-27T18:34:50+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147828318
RSS (Feb 28 2024 at 12:10):Changeset 148006047 (Comment no. 2) by Eugene G
Contributor: Eugene G
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Okay! This makes sense to me, thank you for a clarification!
Date: 2024-02-28T11:13:10+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148006047
RSS (Feb 29 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 148045407 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Paldies par izmaiņām!
Gribēju pieminēt, ka skolu nosaukumus liek uz skolas teritorijas/laukuma (ja tāds ir iezīmēts), piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292318402 nevis uz pašām ēkām, piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89413656 . Jo skolas teritorijā var būt vairākas ēkas un protams visi citi elementi (stadions, celiņi, utt.) arī ir daļa no skolas.
Es šos piemērus un citus jau salaboju.
Paldies
Date: 2024-02-29T10:43:07+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148045407
RSS (Feb 29 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 148029576 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
When adding crossing info about crossing islands (crossing:island=yes), you shouldn't set a yes value when the island is mapped separately and two or more crossing are mapped, for example here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11673936305 .
Date: 2024-02-29T16:23:41+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148029576
RSS (Mar 01 2024 at 00:34):Changeset 148071326 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Lūgums nemainīt Maximai brand=Maxima uz Maxima X. Brendā/zīmolā "X" nav, tas ir tikai veikalam - eksistē tikai viens Maximas veikalu tīkls. Redaktors pagaidām rāda nepareizi brīdinājumu, tas drīz būs izlabots.
Date: 2024-02-29T22:56:29+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148071326
RSS (Mar 01 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 148066472 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, paldies par kartes papildināšanu. Pievienoju https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Delectronics_repair apzīmējumu un nedaudz nomainīju nosaukumu uz vienotu stilu.
Date: 2024-03-01T10:41:05+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148066472
RSS (Mar 02 2024 at 12:09):Changeset 148111987 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Vai šie punkti tiešām ir fordi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682618791 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682618792 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11682618793 ?
Date: 2024-03-02T11:15:11+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148111987
RSS (Mar 02 2024 at 12:09):Changeset 148114305 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Lūgums zīmēt grāvjus atsevišķi no administratīvo robežu līnijām. Un uzmanīgāk pēc tam savienot tos ar citiem elementiem. Kā arī nelietot redaktora piedāvātos labojumus, ja tie neatbilst patiesībai (piemēram neeksistējoši fordi starp ceļiem un grāvjiem). Pieliekot grāvja tegus uz šīm līnijām ir izveidotas ļoti daudz papildus problēmu. Un šo oficiāli noteikto robežas līniju nevar pēc tam bīdīt, kā grāvja līniju. Es, cik varēju, šeit izlaboju.
Date: 2024-03-02T10:54:05+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148114305
RSS (Mar 02 2024 at 12:09):Changeset 148119229 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
You deleted the informal path across the rail tracks here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11105809910 - does it no longer exist?
Thanks
Date: 2024-03-02T10:13:24+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148119229
RSS (Mar 02 2024 at 12:09):Changeset 148120127 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello!
Please don't add bicycle=yes to all/generic footways because this is not technically correct. Access values are for legal/allowed values. Footways should use their default global access value in Latvia, which doesn't forbid bicycles on non-sidewalks and has special rules for sidewalks. Setting any other value overrides this default, implying that there is some sort of sign or exception there. This also makes the data harder to maintain and understand. This is kind of like you wouldn't add motorcar=yes to every road.
Please also don't add things like bicycle=dismount unless it is legally signed so or physically impossible to pass while riding a bike. For example, there is nothing indicating bicycles need to dismount here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87976329 (unless something has changed very recently).
For ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631640974 , you should only add bicycle=no for sections that are mapped as separate ways of a shared cycle path, but not further than that.
I fixed all these. Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks
Date: 2024-03-02T10:06:19+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148120127
RSS (Mar 02 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 148111987 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: AKA brasli :)
Date: 2024-03-02T15:54:01+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148111987
RSS (Mar 02 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 148134879 (Comment no. 1) by silversurfer83
Contributor: silversurfer83
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap
you asked for someone to review this changeset. Here goes:
this looks good :)
good changeset comment, good source, tagging looks alright. Keep it up
cheers
silversurfer83
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148134879
Date: 2024-03-02T15:33:26+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148134879
RSS (Mar 02 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 148135404 (Comment no. 1) by silversurfer83
Contributor: silversurfer83
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap :)
You asked for someone to review your changeset. Here goes:
A barrier need to be a node (point) connected to the way that is impeded by said barrier. You can draw the gate as a line (way) but it needs to connect to the way so software knows this way is blocked.
Details can be found in our wiki at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
It's always a good idea to take a look around the wiki.
In case of questions please reach out. There's always people ready to help :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels
happy mapping
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148135404
Date: 2024-03-02T15:29:52+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148135404
RSS (Mar 04 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148207914 (Comment no. 1) by Colbertson
Contributor: Colbertson
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Deleted :)
https://www.osm.org/changeset/148208267
Date: 2024-03-04T13:56:14+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148207914
RSS (Mar 04 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148107254 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: It's a very high IQ concrete. ;)
I have no idea how I got that. Like, there is nothing here that I would have used the word "logic" for, so I am not sure how I accidentally typed that.
Date: 2024-03-04T13:52:10+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148107254
RSS (Mar 04 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148197443 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Vai šīs takas tiešām vairs neeksistē pāri dzelzceļam šeit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/56.63940/23.66695 ? Tās ir diezgan skaidri redzamas uz ortofoto, kas ir diezgan jauns. Vai šeit ir kaut kas mainījies?
Paldies
Date: 2024-03-04T13:27:44+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148197443
RSS (Mar 05 2024 at 00:29):Changeset 148217395 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
I noticed you updated some of the street names. If you want to map these easier, you can use a cadaster street layer overlaid the aerial in the editor's custom imagery field such as
https://lvmgeoserver.lvm.lv/geoserver/ows?FORMAT=image/jpeg&VERSION=1.3.0&SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetMap&LAYERS=public:Orto_LKS,publicwfs:Kadastra_karte,publicwfs:arisstreet,publicwfs:arisroad,publicwfs:arisbuilding&STYLES=&CRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&BBOX={bbox}
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Source#iD_sl%C4%81%C5%86u_pievieno%C5%A1ana
Cheers
Date: 2024-03-04T19:46:59+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148217395
RSS (Mar 06 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148261751 (Comment no. 4) by PickAqua
Contributor: PickAqua
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Paldies jums!
Date: 2024-03-06T15:41:10+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148261751
RSS (Mar 06 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148294873 (Comment no. 1) by Colbertson
Contributor: Colbertson
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: someone please re-import https://www.osm.org/way/132055106
its gotten mangled over the years from stuff being glued, moved, unglued
Date: 2024-03-06T13:27:26+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148294873
RSS (Mar 07 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 148332983 (Comment no. 4) by Gatis Kurzemnieks
Contributor: Gatis Kurzemnieks
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Drupu vietu pamainīju. Atradu, ka 2000. gadā zemes robežu plānā ir norādīta saimniecība "Mūramājas".
Date: 2024-03-07T11:55:08+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148332983
RSS (Mar 07 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 148333170 (Comment no. 2) by Gatis Kurzemnieks
Contributor: Gatis Kurzemnieks
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Paldies par aizrādījumu.
Grāvis - parasts grāvis. Ceļu tas šķērso pa betona trubu/caurteku.
Laikam neuzmanības pēc sanāca uzlikt visam grāvim. Labošos ;)
Date: 2024-03-07T11:33:14+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148333170
RSS (Mar 07 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148333170 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Liels paldies par burvīgajiem papildinājumiem un atbildēm :)
Ja ir vēlme pievienoties OSM Latvijas kopienas čatam, tas pieejams https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
Date: 2024-03-07T12:14:45+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148333170
RSS (Mar 11 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 148197443 (Comment no. 2) by dacjanis
Contributor: dacjanis
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Sveiks! Pāri dzelzceļam takas visticamāk vēl ir saglabājušās, bet nav iespējams tikt pāri grāvjiem, līdz ar to šķita maldinoši atstāt kartē takas, kas nav sasniedzamas. Iespējams, ka ir bijuši tiltiņi vai krituši koki, bet vairs tādu nav un grāvji ir dziļi.
Date: 2024-03-11T09:05:32+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148197443
RSS (Mar 11 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148508052 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Please use the local accurate "Orthophoto (2016–2018), 1:5000, Latvia" imagery or set the correct Bing imagery offset, because Bing imagery is offset in Latvia.
Thanks
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_aerial_imagery
Date: 2024-03-11T16:44:43+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148508052
RSS (Mar 12 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148547861 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
I have reverted this edit because it broke the parking lot shape, leaving a fence going across a random space and most of parking lot unmapped.
I am not sure what you were attempting to fix and how, but please be more careful. Let me know if I can assist.
Thanks
Date: 2024-03-12T16:25:31+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148547861
RSS (Mar 12 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148551337 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Please do not delete buildings and redraw them (or not draw them at all), but correct the existing building location/shape and/or whatever pathways need correction depending on the actual situation.
In Latvia, please either use the local imagery or set the correct offset for the Bing aerial, because it has an incorrect offset in Latvia and is not suitable for correcting building footprints otherwise.
For example, in this edit, the building was already correctly positioned, but you moved it away. There was also a shop POI mapped, which you didn't move, but which is supposedly within the building, so the point ended up outside the building.
Or, for example, here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551237 you moved the building away from the driveway although the driveway actually passed through the building. You also deleted a nearby building.
Also, please do not delete address information from buildings. This got lost because you redraw a new way instead of using the exiting way with the previous data.
Here, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551105 and https://osmcha.org/changesets/148551011 , you completely deleted a building with no explanation.
In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551719 you deleted a valid viewtower instead of fixing the path layout that most likely passes under it.
I have reverted your edits here. I only fixed edits in Latvia, but I see you have made similar problematic edits elsewhere. So please slow down and carefully review and fix your edits before continuing to make MapRoulette corrections. You are editing live map data.
Thanks
Date: 2024-03-12T16:14:21+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551337
RSS (Mar 13 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 148551337 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: That seems like a lot of problems, some of them related to the process (mappers would be expected to be instructed about the process - like not deleting-redrawing buildings, using non-offset imagery and all the other identified issues).
Flagged the challenge at https://github.com/maproulette/challenge-reports/issues/28 .
Date: 2024-03-12T19:35:42+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551337
RSS (Mar 16 2024 at 12:10):Changeset 148522790 (Comment no. 1) by Dāvis Kļaviņš
Contributor: Dāvis Kļaviņš
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Ja jau ir iezīmēts highway multipoligons, lūgums tajā nepārspīlēt ar ceļu kā līniju izzīmēšanu. Nepieciešami ir tikai galvenie savienojumi priekš maršrutēšanas. Arīdzan lūgums neatstāt ar kopējo ceļu tīklu nesavienotus posmus, ja tie apvidū ir savienoti.
Date: 2024-03-16T09:54:30+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148522790
RSS (Mar 17 2024 at 00:33):Changeset 148738302 (Comment no. 6) by aviation0178
Contributor: aviation0178
Discussion Comment No.: 6
Comment: Big thank you!
Date: 2024-03-16T20:25:12+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148738302
RSS (Mar 18 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 148738302 (Comment no. 7) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 7
Comment: Also very much welcome to discuss things in the Latvian OSM community chat - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com :)
Date: 2024-03-17T20:56:02+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148738302
RSS (Mar 19 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148551434 (Comment no. 1) by Kaduna
Contributor: Kaduna
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi Eric Amponsah, You forgot to solve intersection between building & highway, I have made the fixes for you. Please keep in in mind to fix the validation error. Happy Mapping!
Date: 2024-03-19T13:02:14+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551434
RSS (Mar 19 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148551602 (Comment no. 1) by Kaduna
Contributor: Kaduna
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi Eric Amponsah, You forgot to solve intersection between building & highway, I have made the fixes for you. Please keep in in mind to fix the validation error. Happy Mapping!
Date: 2024-03-19T13:01:13+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551602
RSS (Mar 19 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148551011 (Comment no. 1) by Kaduna
Contributor: Kaduna
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi Eric Amponsah, You forgot to solve intersection between building & highway, I have made the fixes for you. Please keep in in mind to fix the validation error. Happy Mapping!
Date: 2024-03-19T12:59:51+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551011
RSS (Mar 19 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148551105 (Comment no. 1) by Kaduna
Contributor: Kaduna
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi Eric Amponsah, You forgot to solve intersection between building & highway, I have made the fixes for you. Please keep in in mind to fix the validation error. Happy Mapping!
Date: 2024-03-19T12:54:45+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551105
RSS (Mar 19 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148551237 (Comment no. 1) by Kaduna
Contributor: Kaduna
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi Eric Amponsah, You forgot to solve intersection between building & highway, I have made the fixes for you. Please keep in in mind to fix the validation error. Happy Mapping!
Date: 2024-03-19T12:52:33+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551237
RSS (Mar 19 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 148551719 (Comment no. 1) by Kaduna
Contributor: Kaduna
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi Eric Amponsah, You forgot to solve intersection between building & highway, I have made the fixes for you. Please keep in in mind to fix the validation error. Happy Mapping!
Date: 2024-03-19T12:51:44+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551719
RSS (Mar 20 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 124821609 (Comment no. 5) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 5
Comment: Zin, izskatās padsmit cm ārā no Rīgas :)
Date: 2024-03-19T20:24:46+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124821609
RSS (Mar 20 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 148551602 (Comment no. 2) by Colbertson
Contributor: Colbertson
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: He "solved" it by deleting the building, i fixed it properly shortly after.
Date: 2024-03-19T19:30:38+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551602
RSS (Mar 20 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 148738302 (Comment no. 8) by gileri
Contributor: gileri
Discussion Comment No.: 8
Comment: Hi, thank you @aviation0178 for contributing to OSM, and @Hellmap for your welcoming messages !
Just a quick note: while putting source=\* tags on objects is not often useful or encouraged for the reasons HellMap put forward, using it on changesets is definitely useful and encouraged.
It allows other mappers to understand where does the change come from, especially in recently physically changed areas, where things may be visible in some sources but not others yet.
But more importantly, indicating the source of changes is a requirement of most aerial imageries. And a small token of appreciation of their work ;)
This source=\* tag can be set just before sending changes from the iD editor you use, below the changeset message.
Date: 2024-03-20T11:50:24+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148738302
RSS (Mar 21 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 148551602 (Comment no. 3) by Kaduna
Contributor: Kaduna
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Hi Colbertson, Thank you, Happy Mapping
Date: 2024-03-21T06:05:16+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148551602
RSS (Mar 22 2024 at 06:08):Changeset 119520218 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Yay, liels paldies par addr:flats pievienošanu :)
Date: 2024-03-22T05:40:07+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119520218
RSS (Mar 22 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 148967845 (Comment no. 4) by Eugene G
Contributor: Eugene G
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: No, it isn't. Thanks!
Date: 2024-03-22T11:03:41+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148967845
RSS (Mar 22 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 148969013 (Comment no. 4) by Eugene G
Contributor: Eugene G
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Thank you for your help,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149007181
Date: 2024-03-22T11:01:34+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148969013
RSS (Mar 23 2024 at 00:29):Changeset 149016434 (Comment no. 3) by Reinis Bērziņš
Contributor: Reinis Bērziņš
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Paldies! Abas bija kļūmes. Izlaboju uz landuse=garages (gribēju ietagot tikai ēkas, bet nejauši nomainīju tagu visai teritorijai) un location=overhead (jā, sajaucu overhead un overground vietām).
Date: 2024-03-22T20:01:02+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149016434
RSS (Mar 23 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 148833188 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Cool!
Here's a custom background imagery you can use that will show aerial photography and cadaster layer plus street names of top of it, if that helps. It's much easier to adjust streets and properties like that (default iD cadaster layer doesn't have street name.) Although one has to be careful because it's rarely accurate and a lot of "streets" aren't actually streets, but more like reserved future lines than may easily change.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Source#iD_sl%C4%81%C5%86u_pievieno%C5%A1ana
Date: 2024-03-23T10:37:43+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148833188
RSS (Mar 25 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 149132421 (Comment no. 2) by Eugene G
Contributor: Eugene G
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Thank you!
Date: 2024-03-25T14:31:22+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149132421
RSS (Mar 27 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 149176940 (Comment no. 2) by DainaF
Contributor: DainaF
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Nē tur nav avārijas ūdens padeves punkts
Date: 2024-03-27T17:50:18+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149176940
RSS (Mar 27 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 149184645 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Šajā izmaiņā ir daudz kļūdu. Piemēram, savienoti laukumi un ceļi, kas nav jāsavieno; pārvietoti laukumi no oficiālajām kadastra līnijām; nodzēstas pareizas teritorijas; nodzēsti ēku punkti; izdzēsti ceļi; atvienoti ceļi; laukumi iezīmēti pāri upēm, ceļiem un teritorijām; un citas problēmas.
Šeit ir pārāk daudz kā labojama, tāpēc es šo izmaiņu atceļu pilnībā un izlaboju daļu.
Date: 2024-03-27T17:18:40+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149184645
RSS (Mar 28 2024 at 12:12):Changeset 149184645 (Comment no. 4) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Sveiki drtzdrfh, rakstu kā OpenStreetMap datu pārvaldības grupas darbinieks.
Vai varētu, lūdzu, norādīt kādu konkrētu vietu, kur veiktas izmaiņas saskaņā ar būvvaldes datiem vai kadastru, kura pēc tam būtu sabojāta?
Ja Jūsu rediģēšana ir saistībā ar pašvaldības pienākumu veikšanu, varbūt varam vienoties par tikšanos klātienē attiecīgajā pašvaldībā?
Date: 2024-03-28T11:03:21+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149184645
RSS (Mar 28 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 149184645 (Comment no. 6) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 6
Comment: Liels paldies par atbildi, izklausās burvīgi - prieks par aktīviem iedzīvotājiem.
Ja rodas kādi jautājumi vai citas ar kartēšanus saistītas tēmas, tās laipni aicinām apspriest Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
Date: 2024-03-28T16:15:15+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149184645
RSS (Mar 29 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 149282126 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Just wanted to let you know that we don't generally specify access values unless they are different from default or ambiguous. All (non-sidewalk) footways and other paths and roads in Latvia imply bicycle=yes by default unless there is some restriction. This is like they imply foot=yes or kick_scooter=yes or stroller=yes, etc. which we wouldn't all add here one at a time.
Thanks
Date: 2024-03-28T21:14:16+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149282126
RSS (Mar 29 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 149282126 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Could this have been prompted by some routing applications not routing on footways/paths?
Date: 2024-03-29T10:56:19+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149282126
RSS (Mar 29 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 149282126 (Comment no. 4) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Urgh, I just realized someone put incorrect bicycle=dismount on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91301229 and nearby , which causes most routers to go around. And this has been here for years... I will fix this.
But, yes, broadly speaking, this is a difficult issue with routers. It is technically OsmAnd's fault - they should just route on the footways and bicycle=yes shouldn't change anything. Otherwise we'd have to add bicycle=yes to tens of thousands of footways across just Latvia.
The vast majority of footways in Latvia don't have any cycling infrastructure or signs. Like almost all these footways here along the bridge - they are the main ways that cyclists use across it, but none of them have any cycleway signage, so legally they are just footways.
I don't really have a solution for this. If we know that routers are having serious problems here, we can add bicycle=yes and a note that it is needed for routing. But it is really the routers that need to fix their cycling profiles. OsmAnd's profile really should not prefer a primary road over even a long detour over footways.
Date: 2024-03-29T13:28:49+01:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149282126
RSS (Mar 31 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 146702653 (Comment no. 3) by Colbertson
Contributor: Colbertson
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Izdzēsu
Date: 2024-03-31T12:33:00+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146702653
RSS (Apr 01 2024 at 12:12):Changeset 148111987 (Comment no. 3) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Atbildi nesaņēmām, tāpēc šos punktus nodzēsu.
Date: 2024-04-01T10:56:07+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148111987
RSS (Apr 03 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 149440003 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Čau,
Gribēju pieminēt, ka piebrauktuves pie mājām un individuālām teritorijām kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268165210 visticamāk būs driveway arī, ja ļoti garas un zemes ceļi/grantenes, bet ceļi kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268593062 , pa kuriem piekļuve ir vairākām vietām/teritorijām un tālāk sadalās sīkāk parasti ir lielākas nozīmes vai vismaz service. Konkrēti highway=track būs pārsvarā tikai vietās, kur tas ved tikai uz mežiem/laukiem/ezeriem, bet ne viensētām un tml.
Es te piemēram nomainīju.
Date: 2024-04-03T09:31:00+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149440003
RSS (Apr 03 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 149469427 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Can you please clarify what happened to the path at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081129240 ? There are currently two other paths/stairs still connecting to the old path - are they also gone? And the North section does not connect anymore - is there no way to pass through? The Svētā Jēkaba hiking route is now also not following any paths here. On aerial, there appear to be paths at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/57.25662/25.06721 . Are they also gone?
Thanks
Date: 2024-04-03T09:18:03+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149469427
RSS (Apr 03 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 149488467 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Vai uz šīs takas ir aizliegums (vai fiziski neiespējams piekļūt ar) velosipēdiem? Redzu, ka ir norādīts mtb:scale:imba, bet iepriekš jau bija pievienots aizliegums bicycle=no. Varbūt varētu precizēt atļauto piekļuvi, piemēram no informācijas plāksnes vai ceļa zīmēm?
Paldies
Date: 2024-04-03T08:54:46+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149488467
RSS (Apr 03 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 149469427 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Also it's a bit dubious that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429780169/history is unclassified, what was the reasoning for the road upgrade?
Date: 2024-04-03T13:23:28+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149469427
RSS (Apr 04 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 149488467 (Comment no. 2) by Emils Mikelsons
Contributor: Emils Mikelsons
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Sveiki!
Tas, ko es gribēju izdarīt ir atzīmēt to, ka tur nav fiziski iespējams izbraukt ar velosipēdiem.
Tur ir atļauts braukt ar velosipēdiem, bet nav fiziski iespējams izbraukt pa taku.
Varbūt jūs varētu to izlabot? Skatos ka esat lietpratējs šādās lietās.
Date: 2024-04-03T20:59:37+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149488467
RSS (Apr 04 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 149488467 (Comment no. 3) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Skaidrs, paldies par precizējumu.
Es mtb:scale:imba tad noņēmu.
Tīri precīzi OSM bicycle (un visi citi access kā foot vai vehicle) ir domāti legālai un/vai atļautai pieejai. Praktiski to dažviet lieto arī lai norādītu par fiziski neiespējamu, kaut gan tā nevajadzētu uz ceļiem. Šajā gadījumā vajadzētu pietikt ar smoothness=impassable, bet nu lai tas bicycle=no paliek pagaidām.
Date: 2024-04-04T09:06:00+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149488467
RSS (Apr 05 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 149610708 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Vai varētu lūdzu precizēt, kāds šajā vietā ir veloceļa izkārtojums, lai būtu nepieciešams/labāk kartēt divas līnijas tā atzīmēšanas? Parasti (kopīgus) gājēju un velo ceļus zīmē ar vienu līniju un tas jau bija iepriekš pareizi kartēts ar highway=cycleway + bicycle\tdesignated + foot=designated + segregated=yes.
Paldies
Date: 2024-04-05T15:24:53+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149610708
RSS (Apr 06 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 126907165 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: You know, I don't remember. I probably meant to tag it as temporary=yes. I'm looking at my Mapillary footage, but I do not remember the reason. So I'll just remove the temporary tags.
Date: 2024-04-05T20:19:23+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126907165
RSS (Apr 06 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 149487679 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, šis izskatās mazliet aizdomīgi kopā ar https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149487227 .
Šobrīd kā highway=construction is apzīmēti vairāki samērā gari ceļa posmi.
highway=construction nozīmē ceļu, kurš tiek būvēts - tātad pa to nav iespējama motorizētu transportlīdzekļu pārvietošanās.
Bet šajā situācijā tas nozīmētu, ka, piemēram, ceļš https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188637376 vispār nav pieejams.
Sanāk, ka piebraukšana nav iespējama mājām Jaunzemji, Zvejnieki, Zari, Ēveles, Aizpuri un daudzām citām.
Vai tiešām šie ceļi tiek pilnībā pārbūvēti un piekļuve tiem visos apzīmētajos posmos slēgta?
Date: 2024-04-05T18:15:12+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149487679
RSS (Apr 06 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 149488467 (Comment no. 4) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: "nav fiziski iespējams izbraukt ar velosipēdiem" - vai MTB braucēji piekristu? :)
Principā laikam jau labāk būtu tomēr likt smoothness utml tagus, ne bicycle=no. Mums jau ir diezgan daudz sazīmētu taku, kuras ar velo dažādu iemeslu dēļ nav diezko ērti braucamas, bet braucēji jau ir ļoti dažādi.
Vai arī tur ir kaut kas tāds, kā dēļ pilnīgi neviens nepabrauktu (piem., pakāpieni visā garumā)?
Date: 2024-04-05T18:10:18+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149488467
RSS (Apr 06 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 149487679 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: highway=construction teorētiski var braukt, ja ir pielikts access. Nezinu, vai mēs arī tā gribam likt, jo rūteri kā kurš (ne)saprot. Es šeit iepriekš biju paskatījies izmaiņas, lai visur būtu vismaz access un pielaboju. Bet nebiju galveno tegu aizticis.
No izmaiņām sapratu, ka tikai posms pāri tiltam ir pilnībā slēgts.
Piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=56.9237%2C22.7827%3B56.9175%2C22.7951 māk bet https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_car&route=56.9237%2C22.7827%3B56.9175%2C22.7951 nemāk
Date: 2024-04-06T09:08:34+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149487679
RSS (Apr 06 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 149487679 (Comment no. 5) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 5
Comment: Emīl, vai varētu precizēt, kuri posmi pilnībā slēgti satiksmei?
Par Graphopper - es pat nezinu, vai tas nav datu atjaunošanas aiztures dēļ. Maršrutēšana pa =construction nešķiet atbilstoši agrākam lietojumam un wiki aprakstam.
Date: 2024-04-06T13:47:24+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149487679
RSS (Apr 06 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 149634133 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
I fixed a few things in your edit.
Roads that lead to individual properties should be driveways highway=service + service=driveway
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1270233530 . Living streets are only for designated living zones (the blue traffic sign).
It's also better to tag surface as surface=compacted rather than surface=gravel unless they really are larger rocks (walking or cycling would be very uncomfortable if not impossible).
You should usually adjust the existing buildings/features instead of redrawing them. For example, by redrawing
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111714783/history you actually deleted the address information on the old building.
Thanks
Date: 2024-04-06T13:27:34+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149634133
RSS (Apr 07 2024 at 12:10):Changeset 149675008 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
Thanks for the rural map changes.
I wanted to note that when drawing landuse, please don't draw it over the roads. Landuse is an area and ends where the road area begins (unless it's part of the landuse, such as a dwelling, in which case it would include the road, like a driveway). This makes data imprecise and harder to maintain. In Latvia at least, we generally discourage connecting or overlapping areas with ways.
Thanks
Date: 2024-04-07T10:02:41+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149675008
RSS (Apr 09 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 141390169 (Comment no. 3) by Pikse
Contributor: Pikse
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: As there has been no response I went forward and restored country border along river centerline.
Date: 2024-04-09T14:12:18+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141390169
RSS (Apr 10 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 149795546 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, vai te ir tikai šūpoles, vai arī rotaļu laukums?
Noņēmu nosaukumu "šūpoles", jo OSM neliekam "aprakstošus nosaukumus" - t.i., kā nosaukumu parasti norādām tikai reālu vārdu. Piemēram, "Latvija", ne "Viesnīca Latvija", un neliekam nosaukumu "garāžas" (ja vien tas nav kāds klubs vai tamlīdzīga vieta ar tādu nosaukumu :) ).
Date: 2024-04-09T21:34:00+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149795546
RSS (Apr 10 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 149793239 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, bija prieks šodien (vakar) tikties, un liels paldies par turpmākiem papildinājumiem :)
Šeit es nedaudz pielaboju nosaukumu (OSM pieņemts likt gramatiski pareizus nosaukumus bez stilizācijas, kādu dažreiz mēdz lietot uzņēmumi), un nomainīju no amenity=doctors uz amenity=dentist.
Noteikti priecāsimies arī satikt OSM Latvijas kopienas čatā https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
Date: 2024-04-09T21:30:59+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149793239
RSS (Apr 10 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 149795546 (Comment no. 2) by AmOosm
Contributor: AmOosm
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Man šķiet, ka tu nokomentēji uz nepareizā changeset :D
Date: 2024-04-10T11:45:52+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149795546
RSS (Apr 11 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 149792788 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment:
Sveiki, vai te ir tikai šūpoles, vai arī rotaļu laukums?
Noņēmu nosaukumu "šūpoles", jo OSM neliekam "aprakstošus nosaukumus" - t.i., kā nosaukumu parasti norādām tikai reālu vārdu. Piemēram, "Latvija", ne "Viesnīca Latvija", un neliekam nosaukumu "garāžas" (ja vien tas nav kāds klubs vai tamlīdzīga vieta ar tādu nosaukumu :) ).
Date: 2024-04-10T21:43:39+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149792788
RSS (Apr 11 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 149795546 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Oi, tiešām. Liels paldies par pamanīšanu :)
Date: 2024-04-10T21:43:13+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149795546
RSS (Apr 11 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 136144283 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Šim bija access=foot - tādu principā iesaka nelietot, nomainīju uz access=destination saskaņā ar šovakar novēroto :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154314648/history
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Possible_tagging_mistakes
Date: 2024-04-10T18:46:38+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136144283
RSS (Apr 11 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 149762023 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Šo izmaiņu atcēlu, jo atkal ir pieļautas daudz kļūdu. Izdzēsts ceļa gabals bez paskaidrojuma. Atvienots ceļš no šosejas. Ceļš savienots ar lauku. Laukam izdzēsti punkti. Nobīdīti ar ortofoto sakrītoši ceļi. Noņemtas ceļa vērtības. Izdzēsts grāvis.
Jau daudz reižu iepriekš lūgts veikt izmaiņas uzmanīgāk un saprotami tās paskaidrot, it īpaši ceļa posmu dzēšanu. Citiem kartētājiem nav jūsu izmaiņas šādi katrreiz jālabo.
Šis ceļa posms izskatās pēc galvenās piebraukšanas Līgotnes 1 ciematam. Tas ortofoto redzams kā plats lauku ceļš. Kas tieši šajā vietā ir izmainījies? Ko nozīmē "purvs"?
Date: 2024-04-11T13:21:17+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149762023
RSS (Apr 12 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 149882674 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Lūgums nepievienot ietvēm bicycle=yes, ja uz tām nav kaut kādā veidā speciāli norādīts velo maršruts vai kādas zīmes, kas skaidri liecinātu par speciāli paredzētu atļauju velosipēdiem. access vērtības ir atļautai/legālai lietošanai. Un Latvijā uz ietvēm tā nav pareiza vērtība, jo CSN velosipēdiem uz ietvēm ir speciāli noteikumi, kas drīzāk līdzinātos bicycle=permissive, bet OSM nav tādas precīzas vērtības. Tā kā šie noteikumi ir spēkā uz visās ietvēm visā Latvijā, tad šī ir noklusētā vērtība un to nevajag speciāli pievienot, ja vien nav kādas citas norādes (kādas praksē gandrīz nekur nav). Uz celiņiem (takām, u.c.), kas nav ietves, noklusētā vērtība ir bicycle=yes un to nevajag speciāli pievienot. Līdzīgi kā uz visiem celiņiem nepievienotu foot=yes vai uz visiem ceļiem vehicle=yes.
Paldies
Date: 2024-04-12T10:47:51+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149882674
RSS (Apr 12 2024 at 18:06):Changeset 149882674 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Ja tas darīts kāda maršrutētāja dēļ (lai maršrutētu pa ietvēm/gājēju celiņiem), to vislabāk ziņot maršrutētāja autoriem, lai izlabo.
Aicinām arī pievienoties Latvijas OSM kopienas čatā, https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com :)
Date: 2024-04-12T13:39:18+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149882674
RSS (Apr 13 2024 at 12:09):Changeset 136144283 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Y, tieši tā zīme - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=452014137348057.
Un jā, gan šo, gan ķieģeli Latvijā gandrīz visur liek ar domu tikai par auto. Velo papildzīmes tik tā lēnām sāk likt Rīgā.
Date: 2024-04-13T10:18:46+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136144283
RSS (Apr 13 2024 at 12:09):Changeset 149835696 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Paldies par pamanīšanu, slēgts tiešām ir no plānotās Parka ielas - atjaunināju.
Date: 2024-04-13T10:03:08+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149835696
RSS (Apr 13 2024 at 18:06):Changeset 149930967 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Čau. A kurš plugins tas ir? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PolygonCutOut? Kā tu panāci, lai tas izgrieztu ar atkāpi no līnijas? Vai arī tur pa vidu vēl soļi bija.
Date: 2024-04-13T13:58:29+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149930967
RSS (Apr 13 2024 at 18:06):Changeset 136144283 (Comment no. 5) by Reinis Bērziņš
Contributor: Reinis Bērziņš
Discussion Comment No.: 5
Comment: Jā, piekrītu, ka vehicle=destination būtu vispareizākā birka zīmei "Braukt aizliegts". access šeit netiek tiešā veidā ierobežots.
Date: 2024-04-13T12:36:18+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136144283
RSS (Apr 15 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 149995172 (Comment no. 1) by Cucazer
Contributor: Cucazer
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: The new track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1272534387 got connected to landuse contours. This does not make much sense and better to leave the end unconnected or terminate it with a gate or turning circle.
Date: 2024-04-15T15:42:32+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149995172
RSS (Apr 15 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 150035515 (Comment no. 2) by Reinis Bērziņš
Contributor: Reinis Bērziņš
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Paldies! Tagad izlaboju par takām.
Date: 2024-04-15T14:09:05+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150035515
RSS (Apr 16 2024 at 00:30):Changeset 150034583 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Liels paldies par kartes papildinājumiem.
Vai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1272736698 jau izbūvēta kā pilnvērtīga iela visā garumā, vai arī vairāk atbilst track statusam?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Date: 2024-04-15T19:00:52+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150034583
RSS (Apr 20 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 150034686 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki vēlreiz,
Ja šis meža gabals https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764116011 is parka teritorijā, tad nosaukumu nevajadzētu pievienot pa taisno mežam, bet izveidot jaunu laukumu, jo tas pārklājas ar privātīpašumiem. Es šeit to iezīmēju balstoties un kadastra līnijām kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274373477 . Bet gribēju precizēt par šo parku, jo tas jau bija iezīmēts kā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199209997 ziemeļos. Vai tas faktiski ir abās ceļa pusēs? Kas īsti ir šeit dienvidu pusē?
Paldies
Date: 2024-04-20T10:54:05+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150034686
RSS (Apr 20 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 150150213 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Gribēju vēl uzprasīt par https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1255331042/history ceļu - vai tas izdzēst nejauši vai arī ir kāda informācija, ka te nav plānots ceļa posms? Šis gabals bija iezīmēts pēc no kadastra robežu un ceļu līnijām. Pagaidām atjaunoju.
Date: 2024-04-20T10:30:29+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150150213
RSS (Apr 20 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 150034583 (Comment no. 2) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Šajā izmaiņā administratīvās teritorijas līnijai ir "pievienota" upe - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139504730 . Es šo noņēmu.
Date: 2024-04-20T10:10:53+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150034583
RSS (Apr 20 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 150250881 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Are you sure you are doing these highway area conversions correctly?
My understanding is that area:highway is the geometry of a
single road - basically representing the same thing as the road way, but full width/shape. It is generally implied all travel happens along the main way and not everywhere in the area. On the other hand, highway + area=yes is a location where traffic can move in every direction - there is no obvious middle or direction.
Date: 2024-04-20T09:49:10+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150250881
RSS (Apr 20 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 147531368 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
I partly undid your edit. Your removed a street name, reclassified the section incorrectly, removed road geometry and removed vehicle access restriction.
I would also like to ask what does "Impossible to cross railway" mean in this context, because you did not edit anything surrounding the railway, which the roads you edited never cross. You disconnected the track from the road though - so what is here in reality? Is there also no path a person walking/biking could use? Is there a fence or something?
I have added a path here for now pending clarification.
Thanks
Date: 2024-04-20T15:16:32+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147531368
RSS (Apr 20 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 150206283 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Lūgums ņemt vērā, ka parastiem meža ceļiem nosaukumu visticamāk gandrīz nekur nebūs un tāds nosaukums kā "Trase" ir apraksts, kuru nosaukumā nelieto. Norādot ceļa veidu arī tiek saprasti, kas tas ir.
Un seguma vērtībām jābūt kādai no standarta OSM vērtībām, kas ir balstītas uz angļu valodu, piemēram ground, asphalt utt. Latviešu valodā šādas vērtības nebūs izmantojamas.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
Vēl piebildīšu ka dubļi (kas būtu identiski mud vērtībai) parasti Latvijā ir reti, tikai kaut kādos purvos, un parasti sezonāli neizbraucami ceļi pēc ziemas ir vienkārši zeme. Protams, ja te kaut kāda moto/kvadrociklu trase, tad tiešām var būt vissezonāli dubļi mitrā vietā.
Šajās izmaiņās šis jau ir izlabots (izņemot par dubļiem).
Paldies
Date: 2024-04-20T14:19:58+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150206283
RSS (Apr 20 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 150211375 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Thanks for taking the interest in editing the map. I would like to make sure you know that this is a live version of the map, which means any of your edits will become public. This means you should not make test edits.
We've already corrected your couple edits.
Thanks
Date: 2024-04-20T14:11:17+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150211375
RSS (Apr 20 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 150216329 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Jūsu izmaiņā atkal ir nepareizi klasificēts ceļš ar nesaprotamu trajektoriju, kas ortofoto šķērso sētu un kokus, bet nesavienojas ar tur par esošiem ceļiem. Ja šeit ir nozīmīgas ceļu izmaiņas, kas nav vēl atspoguļotas ortofoto, tad lūdzu tās
paskaidrot. Ņemot vērā problēmas iepriekšējās izmaiņās, neviens nevar pārliecināties par šādu izmaiņu pareizību un atbilstību, tāpēc šo ceļu nodzēšu līdz varam saņemt situācijas aprakstu.
Date: 2024-04-20T14:04:38+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150216329
RSS (Apr 20 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 150233926 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Gribēju uzprasīt, vai "Jūrmalas parka bērnu laukums" tiešām ir nosaukums šim rotaļu laukumam https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1274233678 ? Piemēram, uz kādas informatīvas plāksnes? Internetā par to maz informācijas un nav gluži skaidrs, vai tam pastāv nosaukums.
Vēl pieminēšu, ka šeit jau bija iezīmēti atsevišķi rotaļu laukumi un iezīmējot tiem visiem pa virsu vēl vienu rodas datu dublēšana. Es to varu izlabot, bet tikai jānoprecizē:
Vai šeit joprojām ir ortofoto redzamie galda tenisa galdiņi? Jo tie droši vien nebūs iekļauti bērnu spēļu laukumā. OSM bērnu laukums parasti ietver tieši vietas, kur ir inventārs un bērni aktīvi atrodas, bet parasti ne apkārtējo teritoriju. Tas gan uz vietas jāskatās.
Paldies
Date: 2024-04-20T13:53:47+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150233926
RSS (Apr 21 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 150265431 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Šajā izmaiņā šis tornis https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3479393263 nobīdīts no tā sākotnējās vietas. Es pieņemu, ka tā iespējams bija kļūda? Šeit ir aktīvi būvdarbi, tāpēc gribēju precizēt.
Date: 2024-04-21T09:38:25+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150265431
RSS (Apr 21 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 150265431 (Comment no. 3) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Skaidrs. Drošvien bīdot redaktorā ekrānu tas punkts "aizķērās".
Nodzēst gan nevajadzēja, jo tornis eksistē. Es to atgriezu oriģinālajā vietā (ar to pašu punktu).
Date: 2024-04-21T15:02:43+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150265431
RSS (Apr 22 2024 at 00:33):Changeset 150265431 (Comment no. 4) by Anrijs Terauds
Contributor: Anrijs Terauds
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Ok, paldies!
Date: 2024-04-21T19:31:22+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150265431
RSS (Apr 22 2024 at 12:12):Changeset 150326998 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Čau!
Vai tur uz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60963249 parkinga plāksnes vai norādēm nebija norādīti mēneši vai tā arī bija rakstīts "vasarā"? Es pieliku aptuvenus mēnešus pagaidām.
Date: 2024-04-22T10:12:11+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150326998
RSS (Apr 22 2024 at 12:12):Changeset 149792788 (Comment no. 2) by Sandra ČAB
Contributor: Sandra ČAB
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Sveiks, tur ir tikai objekts - Lielās šupoles.
Date: 2024-04-22T08:17:44+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149792788
RSS (Apr 22 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 150344743 (Comment no. 2) by Centra Nams Center Apartments
Contributor: Centra Nams Center Apartments
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Sveiki,
Drīzumā būs informācija, mājas lapa un naktsmītņu rezervēšanas kanāli tiks palaisti. Kopumā būs 8 īstermiņa īres dzīvokļi. Papildināju karti, lai varam viesiem norādīt stāvvietas iespējas SIA Madara 89 nekustamie īpašumi teritorijā.
Privat bank nav vairs tādas. Raunas ielā 15 ir Pasēdnīca un Centra Nams, kā arī telpas veikalam, pašlaik tukšas.
Ja ir iespēja nosūtīt jums epastu varu nosūtīt arī bildes.
Ar cieņu,
Ieva Dreimane
Firma Madara 89 SIA
nekustamie ipašumi
Date: 2024-04-22T17:01:45+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150344743
RSS (Apr 22 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 150345836 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Liels paldies par pamanīšanu.
Varēja pat droši revertēt manu un tad oriģinālo changesetu, ja tā būtu bijis vieglāk.
Date: 2024-04-22T16:07:44+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150345836
RSS (Apr 22 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 150326998 (Comment no. 2) by artuuurs
Contributor: artuuurs
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Sveiciens!
Zīme ir "P maksas", gāju jautāt par apmaksu un man atbildēja, ka nesezonā par brīvu, ka maksa būs "pēc Jāņiem". Precīzākas informācijas man nav :)
Date: 2024-04-22T15:27:21+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150326998
RSS (Apr 23 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 150344743 (Comment no. 5) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 5
Comment: Super, paldies - iespējams, tos būs labāk abus pievienot kā punktus. Apspriedīsimies kopienā.
Date: 2024-04-22T23:26:32+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150344743
RSS (Apr 23 2024 at 12:12):Changeset 150381579 (Comment no. 3) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: The map takes a few minutes to update, so you won't see it at once. By now, you can force your browser to refresh the cached map images with Ctrl + F5 or your browser's equivalent.
If you click the link https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11070676996 you can see it's at the new (approximate) location.
Date: 2024-04-23T11:47:45+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150381579
RSS (Apr 24 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 150394337 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, liels paldies par interesi par OpenStreetMap.
Kāds ir pamatojums šīm izmaiņām?
Date: 2024-04-23T18:29:49+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150394337
RSS (Apr 24 2024 at 06:10):Changeset 150394337 (Comment no. 2) by Ir_jau_aizņemts_vārds
Contributor: Ir_jau_aizņemts_vārds
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Labrīt!
Strādāju Latvijas Ģeotelpiskajā informācijas aģentūrā. Bija lūgums no Aizsardzības Ministrijas šādu informāciju neattēlot. Līdzīgi kā citām līdzīgām vietām.
Date: 2024-04-24T05:48:10+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150394337
RSS (Apr 24 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 150444642 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Vai pārdēvētajai Pāvila Rozīša ielai tiešām bija domāts incline=up gandrīz visā garumā? Tas ir, iela ir ar slīpumu/pāri uzkalnam?
Pieminēšu, ka mainot nosaukumus jāpārbauda, vai nav citas vērtības, kas arī balstās uz šo nosaukumu. Piemēram, šeit palicis name:etymology=Leons Paegle +
name:etymology:wikidata=Q13554453 + name:etymology:wikipedia=lv:Leons Paegle. Šie posmi arī bija palikuši nenomainīti piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1108376327 kā arī viss šis savienojums https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37370774 .
Vēl pieminēšu, ka lielām pilsētas ielām, kur ir adresācija un vecais nosaukums ir daudz izmantots, vajadzētu atstāt veco nosaukumu kā old_name, nevis pilnībā nodzēst.
Es šeit izlaboju (izņemot incline).
Paldies
Date: 2024-04-24T15:29:31+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150444642
RSS (Apr 24 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 149828367 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Paldies par autoservisa nosaukuma pievienošanu, tieši noderēja :)
Date: 2024-04-24T14:52:31+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149828367
RSS (Apr 25 2024 at 00:34):Changeset 150394337 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Liels paldies par atbildi. Šobrīd gan ar šāda veida izmaiņām ir dažādas problēmas, piemēram:
Sazināšos privātā ziņā kā Data Working Group dalībnieks, lai precizētu turpmāku sadarbību ar LĢIA.
Date: 2024-04-24T22:47:50+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150394337
RSS (Apr 28 2024 at 00:35):Changeset 150577514 (Comment no. 2) by Ansisr
Contributor: Ansisr
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Hello,
Thank you for the detailed reply. Yes, apparently my knowledge is limited regarding the laws, thank you for bringing your attention to this. And you are right - that one indeed has parked cars, somehow overlooked it.
I will refrain from making such edits in future.
Take care,
Ansis
Date: 2024-04-27T21:59:40+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150577514
RSS (Apr 28 2024 at 00:35):Changeset 150591926 (Comment no. 1) by Colbertson
Contributor: Colbertson
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Couldnt add some due to demolished or weirdly mapped buildings, oh well.
Date: 2024-04-27T18:26:23+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150591926
RSS (Apr 29 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 150591926 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Weirdly mapped could be fixed, demolished wouldn't fit in OSM, I guess :)
Date: 2024-04-29T17:27:14+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150591926
RSS (Apr 29 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 150577514 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Thank you so much for map improvements and the considerate discussion.
All discussions on OSM are also highly welcome in the Latvian OSM community chat - https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com .
Date: 2024-04-29T16:56:46+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150577514
RSS (Apr 29 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 150660273 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Thanks for your changes!
Just to let you know, it is not necessary to specify access values in places where they are default/implied and the ways don't have any legal exceptions. On vast majority of highway=footway, there don't need to be extra values. While access value hierarchy is a complex topic, in summary, it is not technically correct to say access=no here, because there are other modes of transportation that are not foot and bicycle.
Thanks
Date: 2024-04-29T15:03:42+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150660273
RSS (May 03 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 150823997 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Vai varētu precizēt, kas tieši domāts ar celiņu klasifikāciju attiecībā uz veloceļiem? Pievienotie tegi ir nedaudz neskaidri. Latvijā ir vai nu parasti celiņi un ietves vai arī veloceļi - kopīgi vai sadalīti. Bet (gandrīz) nav citu "pa vidu" variantu. Tāpēc piemēram kombinācija highway=footway + bicycle=designated (piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112260626 ) nav gluži korekta.
Vairāk info https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Veloce%C4%BCi_un_veloinfrastrukt%C5%ABra
Paldies
Date: 2024-05-03T11:32:10+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150823997
RSS (May 03 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 150737523 (Comment no. 2) by bmiww
Contributor: bmiww
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Ah, thanks for correcting it.
Date: 2024-05-03T15:02:57+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150737523
RSS (May 04 2024 at 00:31):Changeset 112262265 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki, pamanīju, ka šajā izmaiņu kopā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268498822/history "source" tagam pievienots "Balticmaps".
Tā kā šīs izmaiņas ir no 2021. gada, iespējams, viss jau atrisināts - bet drošības labad jāpiemin, ka OSM nedrīkst neko kopēt no Balticmaps. Ja kādas tādas izmaiņas vēl palikušas, tās visas vajadzētu atcelt.
Date: 2024-05-03T18:09:00+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112262265
RSS (May 04 2024 at 12:10):Changeset 150871108 (Comment no. 1) by AmOosm
Contributor: AmOosm
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Did you intend to use building:flats? That is for specifying the amount of flats a building has. For entrances you are probably looking for addr:flats instead.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11878556663
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:flats
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:flats
Date: 2024-05-04T10:38:32+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150871108
RSS (May 07 2024 at 12:12):Changeset 150893940 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Lūdzu nemaini celiņus uz veloceliņiem, ja tur nav uzliktas atbilstošas ceļa zīmes, kas maina šo ceļu nozīmi.
Piemēram, zem tilta nav veloceļš. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1256945641625197&focus=photo
Vai piemēram, iebraucot gājēju tunelī, nav veloceļš (ir velomaršruts, bet zīme attiecas uz braukšanu taisni). https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=412083145114145&focus=photo
Šajā posmā salaboju.
Paldies
Date: 2024-05-07T10:50:03+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150893940
RSS (May 09 2024 at 00:32):Changeset 151032421 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
I am assuming the "parking lot" has "tikai ar atļaujām" sign? In the OSM sense, this is not access=permit, but just access=private. Permit implies that anyone from the public could get a permit. But in a location like this, it is highly unlikely they would issue permits to everyone, even if they don't study or live here.
Date: 2024-05-08T18:37:02+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151032421
RSS (May 10 2024 at 00:32):Changeset 151032421 (Comment no. 2) by Markalex2209
Contributor: Markalex2209
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: It has 523, with "Izņemot ar RTK atļaujām".
After reading what the access=permit means I agree.
Thanks for clarification and guidance.
Date: 2024-05-09T23:23:35+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151032421
RSS (May 11 2024 at 12:11):Changeset 143138952 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Vai nav palicis atmiņā, kas tas par punktu - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11289892444 . Piezīmē norādīts "drainage", bet tad tas diez vai ir "well", kur var ņemt (parasti dzeramu) ūdeni.
Date: 2024-05-11T11:54:55+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143138952
RSS (May 11 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 47870537 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: A kas tas tāds ir/bija te? 2017 Mapillary tikai stāvvieta.
Date: 2024-05-11T16:00:53+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47870537
RSS (May 12 2024 at 00:35):Changeset 47870537 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: ĀĀĀ, droši vien barrier=chain, tajā laikā maps.me bija praktiski vienīgā mobilā appa, un tur bija ļoti ierobežoti POI tipi :)
Date: 2024-05-11T18:46:39+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47870537
RSS (May 12 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 143138952 (Comment no. 3) by Reinis Bērziņš
Contributor: Reinis Bērziņš
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Šajā gadījumā vairs nebūs aktuāli, bet vispār nākotnes vārdā: man šķiet, ka arī meliorācijas aka var tikt apzīmēta ar man_made=water_well, bet var pierakstīt klāt drinking_water=yes/no. Tīrās vietās meliorācijas akas var izmantot pilnīgi identiski kā dzeramā ūdens akas, kas abas parasti izraktas līdz gruntsūdeņu slānim. Arī es visu bērnību izmantoju 2 šādas meliorācijas akas gan dzeršanai gan piena dzesēšanai. Šeit doti dažādi piemēri, no kuriem 2 piemēros praksē nevar iegūt nekādu ūdeni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwater_well
Date: 2024-05-12T15:16:19+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143138952
RSS (May 12 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 151220514 (Comment no. 1) by Colbertson
Contributor: Colbertson
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Big thanks for adding information about the artist and material
Date: 2024-05-12T13:14:42+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151220514
RSS (May 13 2024 at 00:33):Changeset 143138952 (Comment no. 4) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Skaidrs, paldies par precizējumu.
Jā, pagaidu būvniecības lietas nav jēgas zīmēt (izņemot teritoriju).
Vispārīgi, tiešam nevaru neko labāku par man_made=water_well atrast. Ja būtu apsegta/ar vāku, tad varētu vēl man_made=manhole. Bet tādas atvērtas, kur vēl var gruntsūdeni ņemt, laikam OSM nav precīza tega. Līdz šim neesmu gluži nekur sastapies ar tādu (vismaz nesabrukušu), tāpēc nav bijusi "problēma" iezīmēt.
Date: 2024-05-12T20:31:45+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143138952
RSS (May 13 2024 at 18:07):Changeset 141253716 (Comment no. 2) by saulsardzene
Contributor: saulsardzene
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Jā, tur nav veikals, bet erycasynths instrumentu ražotne, komplektēšanas vieta, birojs, radošā darbnīca, no kuras arī sintezatori tiek izsūtīti pa visu pasauli. Nezināju, kādu labāk "tagu" likt. Ko ieteiktu? https://www.ericasynths.lv/
Date: 2024-05-13T17:22:35+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141253716
RSS (May 14 2024 at 00:32):Changeset 141253716 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Varbūt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=company ?
Date: 2024-05-13T19:10:28+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141253716
RSS (May 14 2024 at 12:12):Changeset 141253716 (Comment no. 4) by saulsardzene
Contributor: saulsardzene
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Paldies! Jā, šis laikam varētu būt atbilstošāk.
Date: 2024-05-14T07:24:53+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141253716
RSS (May 14 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 151317745 (Comment no. 1) by thetorturedpoetsdepartment
Contributor: thetorturedpoetsdepartment
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: accidentally requested review, it isnt nessecary anymore.
Date: 2024-05-14T16:26:08+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151317745
RSS (May 14 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 151244877 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Vienu kapsētu vairākos gabalos zīmēt nevajadzētu, jo tad te datos sanāk ir 3 atsevišķas kapsētas (ar vienādiem nosaukumiem). Tā vietā, konkrēti kapsētām, katru "apgabalu" var norādīt ar cemetery=sector.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcemetery#How_to_map
Principā ceļi, kas iet caur kapsētu, ir kapsētas teritorijā.
Date: 2024-05-14T13:21:07+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151244877
RSS (May 14 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 151251769 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Just a note that you should not change any objects solely to render on the default map. OSM is used by many maps and data consumers and what is rendered or parsed is different. For example, tagging this as a separate building means that the data now contains a separate building here (even if it looks like one on the default map).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
I adjusted here to how building "air corridors" like this are usually tagged. Depending on which building it is part of - that building would include this shape and then the part itself duplicating the contour can specify how it's different.
Notably for levels/floors OSM maps this a little confusingly, but this is a 2 level building that starts at the second level - building:levels=2 and
building:min_level=1.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:min_level
Date: 2024-05-14T13:05:38+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151251769
RSS (May 14 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 151274877 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Informācijai, vispārīgi sakot pamatgadījumos, ja ir ar zilo zīmi apzīmēta dzīvojamā zona, tad galvenos ceļus ir jāatzīmē kā dzīvojamās ielas neatkarīgi vai tur gar sāniem stāvvietas vai maģistrāle. Noteikumi iekšpagalmos (un stāvvietās) gandrīz sakrīt, bet tomēr faktiskā klasifikācija un OSM pēc funkcijas izmantošanai pārsvarā ir jāsakrīt ar legālo nozīmi.
Šeit izskatās, ka iebraukšana ir caur privātiem vārtiem/barjeru, un tad visticamāk var atstāt arī kā service, jo piekļuve faktiski ir īpašumam. OSM izpratnē tas iespējams nav vairs ceļš bet piebrauktuve. Tas praktiski var būt iemesls, kādēļ šādās vietās varētu nelikt dzīvojamās ielas.
Protams, jāskatās daudzos gadījumos uz vietas. Ar daudzstāvu māju pagalmiem ir ļoti sarežģīti.
Šeit es personīgi atstātu šo plato posmu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282841562 kā dzīvojamo ielu kamēr šis posms iet gar vairākām mājām un vēl nav pārvērties par stāvvietu. Parasti, ja no tā ceļa atdalās vēl sīki ceļi un iebrauktuves, tad droši vien tas vēl ir OSM izpratnē pēc funkcijas savienojošais ceļš ar regulāru satiksmi uz dažādām vietām.
Paldies
Date: 2024-05-14T12:48:46+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151274877
RSS (May 14 2024 at 18:09):Changeset 151297175 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki!
Paldies par izmaiņām. Nedaudz pielaboju.
Šeit pēc kadastra ir divas ēkas (un divas adreses), tāpēc atvienoju kā iepriekš. Tā kā skola tagad viena, tad galvenā informācija ir uz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772990646 laukuma, bet ēkām tikai apzīmējums, ka skolas ēka.
Vēl piebildīšu, ka building=gymansium nozīmē lielu ēku sportam un fizkultūrai, bet ne viss "ģimnāzija". Drošvien šo var tā pazīmēt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170010789 bet ne ēkas, kur ir pamattelpas.
Paldies
Date: 2024-05-14T12:35:33+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151297175
RSS (May 15 2024 at 00:32):Changeset 151251769 (Comment no. 3) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Sure thing!
Warnings will happen, but they are just warnings - if the tagging and geometry are correct, then they can be ignored. The iD editor is not very good with complex situations with levels and building parts and often complains about stuff and offers incorrect fixes. Technically, the points do not connect to the building, because they are on different layers (and obviously do not connect in real life), but this is when the editor starts complaining - it does not understand that a building part on a different layer implies that the building itself in that location does not overlap anything. Building parts in particular are complex, because they "override" the building shape, but almost no tools out there (except 3D renderers) really understand this.
Date: 2024-05-14T23:00:03+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151251769
RSS (May 15 2024 at 00:32):Changeset 24425344 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Neato, thanks :)
Date: 2024-05-14T19:20:09+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24425344
RSS (May 15 2024 at 00:32):Changeset 151244877 (Comment no. 3) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Liels paldies par burvīgo diskusiju un kartes papildinājumiem :)
Runājot par brāļu kapiem, gribēju tik nedaudz pareklamēt potenciālus papildtagus:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cemetery%3Dwar_cemetery
Date: 2024-05-14T19:18:14+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151244877
RSS (May 15 2024 at 00:32):Changeset 151274877 (Comment no. 2) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 2
Comment: Agrāk (nu jau droši vien pirms gadiem 10 :) ) vienojāmies, ka living_street ir tur, kur ir attiecīgās zīmes. Citur liekam service, potenciāli ar precizējošiem tagiem.
Date: 2024-05-14T19:14:41+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151274877
RSS (May 15 2024 at 06:09):Changeset 151251769 (Comment no. 4) by Markalex2209
Contributor: Markalex2209
Discussion Comment No.: 4
Comment: Not great. As a novice in tagging, I try to err on side of caution. And when I see warnings, I assume that it's my fault, not editor's (except for obviously ignored by somebody else previously warnings, like happens a lot with crossings).
Date: 2024-05-15T05:48:20+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151251769
RSS (May 15 2024 at 12:13):Changeset 151251769 (Comment no. 7) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 7
Comment: @rich: True building passages where the way goes \through\ (like many Soviet apartment blocks have around her) are indeed generally connected and this doesn't stop routing. This here isn't a building passage but a sky bridge. It's more similar to a bridge area - you wouldn't connect it there or you will end up connecting different layers - like a lower path to a bridge railing - this would break routing. So if one were to map something more than just a building wall/part, then such a connection would be problematic. It usually isn't and which is why I said it's "technically" incorrect, but practically fine for most cases. I left them connected here myself when adjusting the building part.
Date: 2024-05-15T09:53:42+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151251769
RSS (May 15 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 151360724 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
Thanks for your changes!
I made some corrections. I will mention the most important ones below.
It is best not to connect wood and grass areas to other ways - they don't actually overlap roads, footway surfaces and similar (such as where asphalt begins). For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1282893931 . You should also be careful not to connect them at random points - if in doubt, leave a gap to the way. Not all areas need to connect with point - only those that logically of physically connect should. For example, a park can have wooded areas or grass areas, etc.
Wood areas should also be used only for significant tree cover rather than sparse occasional trees like around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283272978 . And areas like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688335881/ are definitely not wood. Similarly, areas like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688335891 are not parks, just small grass patches.
Paths like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1283271204 should connect all the way to roads, otherwise they will not work with routing software.
There are a lot of things to cover, so let me know if you have specific questions.
Cheers
Date: 2024-05-15T16:46:32+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151360724
RSS (May 16 2024 at 12:12):Changeset 151321240 (Comment no. 1) by Shandhivya
Contributor: Shandhivya
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. OMGURU
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151321240
Date: 2024-05-16T07:55:06+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151321240
RSS (May 16 2024 at 12:12):Changeset 151274877 (Comment no. 3) by Pilsetkartetajs
Contributor: Pilsetkartetajs
Discussion Comment No.: 3
Comment: Sveiki, paldies par komentāriem!
Nomainīju šeit ceļiem klasifikāciju, jo šai teritorijai pie šlagbaumiem ir privātās stāvvietas zīme (P burts ar papildzīmi), kas nozīmē, man liekas, ka visi ceļi māju pagalmā atrodas stāvlaukumā un ir attiecīgi service ceļi.
Date: 2024-05-16T06:10:30+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151274877
RSS (May 17 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 151423289 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi!
The edit by itself looks okay.
I should note that the cycle lanes themselves should be added either as separate ways or tags on the road, depending on what they are (like, are there any physical separators?).
I cannot say more without surveying the location, which I will likely do soon and fix/adjust everything as needed.
One question I have - can you (not) turn left here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26705673 coming from West from Ezemalas turnign North to Viskaļu (towards the apartment area NE)? If you can, then the road should not join at such a sharp angle.
Similarly, can you (not) turn here left https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26705676 ?
Cheers
Date: 2024-05-17T15:15:59+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151423289
RSS (May 17 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 151451643 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hello,
I changed draugiem back to contact:draugiem for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8318370892 . I don't see this mentioned anywhere in import description, so I am assuming an error.
Date: 2024-05-17T14:13:37+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151451643
RSS (May 19 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 122685588 (Comment no. 1) by richlv
Contributor: richlv
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Hi, this changeset has changed isolated_dwelling to locality, for example, on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2073687599/history .
As per OSM wiki, "place=locality tag is used to name an unpopulated location for which there is no extant feature to which the tag could be associated", this this change seems to be incorrect - was there a specific reason for that?
If not, will see about switching back to isolated_dwelling.
Date: 2024-05-19T17:08:59+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122685588
RSS (May 19 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 151488834 (Comment no. 7) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 7
Comment: Pielaboju, cik sapratu no apraksta.
Parasti OSM tādas zīmes vispār neliek, bet gan apzīmē to jēgu/ietekmi uz attiecīgajiem elementiem. Šajā gadījumā - uz ceļa ir access=private, jeb piekļuve nav publiski atļauta. Es atstāju tavu komentāru tur, jo vieta stulba un varbūt kādam (visdrīzāk nākotnes kartētājam) palīdzēs saprast situāciju.
Date: 2024-05-19T16:17:05+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151488834
RSS (May 19 2024 at 18:08):Changeset 151535232 (Comment no. 1) by HellMap
Contributor: HellMap
Discussion Comment No.: 1
Comment: Sveiki,
Gribēju pieminēt, ka OSM zīmē to, kas ir sastopams dabā, bet tādas lietas kā Rīgas terplāns var un bieži neatbilst patiesai situācijai. Šajā gadījumā OSM zīmē tā, kā tas ir realitātē. Ar teritoriju robežām jābūt piesardzīgi, jo ne terplāns ne kadastrs nav precīzi (un kadastrs parasti ir precīzāks privātām teritorijām).
Kā piemēru minētu šādu punktu - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11917775929 . Varbūt terplānā tur arī ir trijstūrītis "nogriezts". Bet dabā var redzēt ortofoto, ka sēta ir tuvāk un faktiski gandrīz pa kadastra robežu - tāpēc arī iezīmēt vajadzētu gar faktisko teritoriju, kas tiek izmantota kā privātā.
Date: 2024-05-19T15:19:06+02:00
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151535232
Last updated: May 19 2024 at 21:42 UTC